User talk:Wknight94/Archive 17: Difference between revisions
Bloddyfriday (talk | contribs) replied |
Bloddyfriday (talk | contribs) →socks: signed it |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
=== socks=== |
=== socks=== |
||
you asked me why i was using socks, well i haven't been. my internet is disconnected at home so now im using a school computer. i wasn't even planning to use this account again but the school i.p. was blocked so its not me. |
you asked me why i was using socks, well i haven't been. my internet is disconnected at home so now im using a school computer. i wasn't even planning to use this account again but the school i.p. was blocked so its not me. [[User:Bloddyfriday|Bloddyfriday]] 13:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:23, 23 October 2007
IPs evading block, WP:CANVASS, sock of indef blocked user
I see you correctly interpreted the situation here with regards to 66.81.157.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), which you blocked with the note: Abusing multiple accounts: Admitted sock of banned user. -- however you missed two more sock IPs of indef blocked sock Makoshack (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). They are:
- 66.81.157.205 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 66.53.222.202 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Thanks for your time. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 04:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC).
- You may also wish to consult Gscshoyru (talk · contribs), who I believe reported the first IP sock evading blocks, and check User:Gscshoyru's various informative comments in the edit history, whilst cleaning up after this IP sock. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 04:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC).
- S/he is obviously changing IPs at will and across a very large range so there is no point in blocking. I semi-protected the relevant pages instead. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Evidently I don't know what I'm doing. Would you mind deleting those two pages so I can move the Diamond Jaxx page to where it belongs? Thank you! Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think I got everything. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Looks good. I hadn't realized (or had forgotten) that a "move" leaves a redirect. I can understand why they do that, to prevent vandals from renaming to something obscure which no one can find. Thank you for fixing. d:) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think I got everything. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Liebman socks - 10/20/07
Here we go again... [1] --Ebyabe 16:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for giving me the proper information regarding reporting vandalism. I am sure I will be following your advice in the near future. Best Regards!NancyHeise 14:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for blocking the user who vandalized my talk page. But when I first saw the actual vandalism, there was one thought that came into my head, as to why they would vandalize my page, who they are. A couple months ago, during a dispute between me and Chrisjnelson (talk · contribs), he made a statement (which he claims wasn't directed at me, but he was reverting an edit I made) saying "removing nazi propaganda". Because the vandalism was the user putting a large swastika on my talk page, and since that was the symbol of the Nazi party, do you think there might be some sort of connection? Ksy92003(talk) 18:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Read Godwin's law - Nazi nonsense is a common theme in Internet disputes and vandalism, etc. So much for forgetting about Chrisjnelson, eh? —Wknight94 (talk) 18:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe yeah I guess. I guess it's just that because of these conflicts, when something like this happens, Chris is the first one I would suspect, and I thought it might've been more than just coincidence that it the vandalism was a Nazi reference. Ksy92003(talk) 18:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're letting Nelson ruin your time here and I really wish I knew what to say to stop you from doing that. I should do you a favor and start blocking you every time you say anything to or about him - but of course I can't. I can picture you getting frustrated when your eventual RFA goes sour and Nelson getting banned because he can't control what he says to you - and there's two great editors down the drain simply because they can't go to their own corners of the sandbox. It's quite depressing. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe yeah I guess. I guess it's just that because of these conflicts, when something like this happens, Chris is the first one I would suspect, and I thought it might've been more than just coincidence that it the vandalism was a Nazi reference. Ksy92003(talk) 18:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's also because the vandalism was BW's first edit, and I was wondering "Why me? Why did he have to vandalize my talk page?" Instinctively, I thought that since Chris was blocked that it would be him because he's the only one who I've had conflicts with that I haven't resolved yet. I didn't really think it was him, but I'm the kind of person who always tries to figure out who does what. If I don't know the person, and have never encountered them before, I get curious. That's all. I don't want to spend too much time on this. Ksy92003(talk) 19:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- What about this? A confessed rampant sock vandal and troll? I notice about 10% of the edits on your talk page and even I know there are lots of better candidates than Nelson for being a childish swastika vandal. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, guess I kinda forgot about that. Again, it was first instinct that I thought of Chris specifically because of the Nazi connection. I'm willing to let this go now; it doesn't really concern me that much at all. Ksy92003(talk) 19:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- What about this? A confessed rampant sock vandal and troll? I notice about 10% of the edits on your talk page and even I know there are lots of better candidates than Nelson for being a childish swastika vandal. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's also because the vandalism was BW's first edit, and I was wondering "Why me? Why did he have to vandalize my talk page?" Instinctively, I thought that since Chris was blocked that it would be him because he's the only one who I've had conflicts with that I haven't resolved yet. I didn't really think it was him, but I'm the kind of person who always tries to figure out who does what. If I don't know the person, and have never encountered them before, I get curious. That's all. I don't want to spend too much time on this. Ksy92003(talk) 19:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey
could you protect Enzyme kinetics as well? It got hit really badly in the last hour. Kwsn(Ni!) 17:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, sorry. It's the main page article. It will subside when it's off the front page. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help
Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- My pleasure! —Wknight94 (talk) 20:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Beautiful
LMFAO! -- But|seriously|folks 20:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Couldn't resist. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
I saw your note on my user talk page of September 27th. By now you may have forgotten about it. So sorry. I didn't mean to offend you. In fact, looking at the original message, I didn't list your name on purpose because it wasn't directed at you. Sorry, again.
Please accept these easter egg early, you're still on the list for Easter 2008.Mrs.EasterBunny 21:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/American_Easter_Eggs_2800px.jpg/100px-American_Easter_Eggs_2800px.jpg)
Liebman?
This one looks like another Liebman, except it almost looks like an actual citation. [2] Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 23:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Citation or not, he's been banned. He can apply for reinstatement like everyone else. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
socks
you asked me why i was using socks, well i haven't been. my internet is disconnected at home so now im using a school computer. i wasn't even planning to use this account again but the school i.p. was blocked so its not me. Bloddyfriday 13:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)