User talk:Fran Rogers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:06, 27 October 2007

I prefer to keep all correspondence in the same place; if you leave me a message here, I will respond here. If I post a message on your talk page, please reply there rather than here. Thank you!

1/2/2007 - 5/5/2007 | 5/5/2007 - 6/18/2007 | 6/19/2007 - 7/23/2007
| 7/24/2007 - 8/24/2007 | 8/22/2007 - present

My local time is currently 12:59 EDT.

Jarlaxle

Apparently this guy is still active--see this vandalism report on Meta. Blueboy 96 20:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That report seems to have been added two years ago, with no additional updates since; I do not think this vandal is active anymore. --krimpet⟲ 21:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD inactivity notification

You have been declared inactive at USRD. If this is in error, feel free to restore yourself to the list, but only if you are truly active at USRD. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont let the shock troops scare you

Krimpet, don't let MONGO's shock troops scare you. These are not nonpartisan spectators at all. MONGO elected Crockspot to Admin status.[1] (which failed). Crockspot follows MONGO everywhere, defending everything MONGO does. Proabivouac continues to echo MONGO.

Despite an uproar, MONGO lost his admin status because of his nasty comments to others:

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Seabhcan/Evidence#MONGO_has_repeatedly_violated_our_Civility_and_No_personal_attacks_policies

The 10 bigot and 2 racists comments are my favorite.

Several editors have been amazed that any wikiuser can get away with such comments. But somehow Mongo has. Maybe they all work for Homeland security like MONGO did--I dont know.

Editors have been complaining about his personal attacks on ANI for months, no one does anything.[2]

On a related note, the current Arbcom case with SOD/NuclearUmpf/Zer0faults mentioned above has a long history. I actually was the one who found out that NuclearUmpf was Zer0faults. NuclearUmpf suddenly turned on MONGO and revealed some pretty interesting information about how Mongo leads a group of editors on how to vote in AFDs, etc.[3][4] NuclearUmpf was protected from any administrative attacks until he turned against MONGOs group, then he was swiftly indefinetly banned.

Not that I am a nonpartisan spectator, MONGO and I have never seen eye to eye, just three months ago he was calling for my indefinete ban.

I am glad that an admin finally had the bravery and fortitude to stand up to such blatant abuse of WP:NPA. It is no surprise that several admins came to MONGOs aid when he got boot. If you look at his boot log, everyone of his boots is quickly revered. Noone (or is it No one?) should be above the rules. Thanks again.Travb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trav, I am advising you not to personally attack me. Have I ever talked trash about you? Krimpet made an error, and I offered her constructive criticism. - Crockspot 13:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the support. :) It does really disappoint me that editors like MONGO are able to consistently flout the civility rules that hold our project together, and are given carte blanche to game the system as they please. I really wish the community would start holding MONGO and friends accountable to the same policies and guidelines that apply to the rest of us; until then, the needless edit wars and drama will continue, the credibility of our project and its leadership will continue to go down the tubes, and overall our goal of building an encyclopedia will drift farther and farther away from us. :( --krimpet⟲ 18:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was never "the civility rules" which held this] project together, but sincerity, rationality, insight and seriousness of purpose. Civility is an easy thing to game, and still easier for dishonest and insincere people. What you call civility amounts to hardly anything more than the absence of overt emotional content.Proabivouac 06:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have my support any time Krimpet. You are very brave, but in a levelheaded way. Travb (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you want this. • Lawrence Cohen 23:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[5] ;) --krimpet⟲ 23:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, but it's only partially resolving the issue, on any dynamic pages (e.g. Watchlist) the notice keeps loading, displaying, then removing. Can we force it to not load in the first place? — xaosflux ^Talk 01:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately that would probably have to be done at the developers' level. :/ It would be a fairly easy fix to this code, if someone can prod the devs to do it. --krimpet⟲ 01:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I am a new member of Wikipedia. I look up to you as a leader of the Wikipedian force. I have a quick question: How do create userboxes because when I search the users of Wikipedia, it looks like a hot item. How do I do that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ps45 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! You can find detailed information on userboxes, where to find them, and how to add them to your talk page at Wikipedia:Userboxes. :) --krimpet⟲ 09:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eyes of Jimbo

Hi, can I use the image in a personalized Barnstar? (I also don't know if the blink thingy can be incorporated or if the image will fit inside the small part of the barnstar. Besides, I haven't learned how to make one yet). Anyways, the barnstar will be used to award good arguments in the Afd (a good Delete argument (countering all Keep votes or going against a snow keep and winning) or a good Keep argument (sufficient expansion of article until the Heymann Standard or going against a snow delete and winning). --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can if you'd like — I simply took the frames directly from the fundraising video. :) --krimpet⟲ 20:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, check it out. --Lenticel ^(talk) 21:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary attack by Calton

Please look at this remark made by Calton on an edit I made. The term "Buckwheat" can and has been considered racist in the past. At the very least the remark is rude. [6]. TruthCrusader 20:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented on his talk page. --krimpet⟲ 20:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least the remark is rude. As is calling a comment left on his talk page "vandalism", as he has done. As is telling someone to "fuck off, you wikipedia nazi", as the delicate, reading-impaired flower whinging above has done off-wiki. Taking the side of a troll with self-control problems: generally a bad idea. Certainly a good way to drive away productive contributors in favor of the poisonous. A little research before making threats: always a good idea. --Calton | Talk 11:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calton consider what you just said, you aren't exactly being sugar and spice yourself. If you calm down and cool the language I am sure you will get a better response. Viridae ^Talk 11:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremely offended by Calton's remarks above. Rather than take this to a higher authority I am going to let this slide and request that Calton again leave me alone and stop his hateful attacks on me. I do not contribute to Wiki much anymore due to real life, but I do not need to worry about slander being spread about myself either. TruthCrusader 16:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you aren't exactly being sugar and spice yourself. If you calm down and cool the language I am sure you will get a better response.

Really. You actually believe that "cool[ing] the language" will have the slightest effect on someone who told me (pay attention now, it was right there above) "fuck off, you wikipedia nazi", who has a multiple block log demonstrating his impulse-control problems, and who has had a long-term history of looking for excuses to get me banned? You might just as well wish for that and a pony, too.

Speaking of which, I'm sending you a full copy of his latest message to me, via e-mail. Some redacted highlights:

I know who you are....a[n] ... arrogant bitter angry fucktard whose alcoholic father raped a ... woman and had the misfortune of fathering YOU...piece of shit who uses the fact that he was taunted all his life ... to bring misery and bitterness to Wikipedia. You're the worst example of a wikipedia editor and a human being in general.

...you come across as a bitter 15 year old emo kid. You will never amount to anything except a lonely old english teacher (which means you are also probably a pedophile). The best thing for you to do would be to blow your fucking brains out.

Lemme know how that double-standard troll-enabling philosophy works out for you. Meanwhile, a good dose of common sense would work out better here on Wikipedia instead of carrying water for trolls. --Calton | Talk 13:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I commented on my talk page I wasn't reffering to your interactions with TruthCrusader, I was reffering to your interactions with Krimpet. Viridae ^Talk 13:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have NO idea what Calton is talking about. But yet again he has left another personal attack on my talk page. [7]. I think he is possibly being trolled by someone and for whatever reason he sees fit to falsely blame me. In any event his personal attack on my talk page, coming so soon on the heels of a ban he got for the exact same thing, i think warrents some kind of action beyind a warning. Thank you and I am sorry this is getting ugly. TruthCrusader 17:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eyes of Jimbo.gif

I've tagged this with {{subst:nrd}}. Well, briefly, then I undid it - it realyl should be licensed through, someone should talk to the foundation —Random832 02:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Libelous description used in image deletion

Delete as you want, the image in question was orphaned anyways, but your summary of your action as resultant from copyvio, or copyright violation, constitutes an act of libel committed against myself, the uploader. This is something I see no reason to tolerate or accept, especially considering you took this action after having seen the discussion regarding the image, a discussion where it was indicated that the image was not a copyrighted image because it was the result of the work of the federal government of the United States of America.

In the future, when you decide to be bold and jump the gun cause hey, its an orphaned image anyways, please refrain from making false accusations about the original uploader; as there is not much motivation to reupload an orphaned public domain image that remains available from the source at http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml04/04195f.jpg (page: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml04/04195.html) anyways. Thankyou... Zaphraud 06:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The arguments brought up in the IfD discussion already explain it all. Images on the CPSC website, or any other federal government website, are not necessarily public domain unless that image was produced as part of work by a federal employee. Because of the way product recalls are performed, it seems most likely that this image was provided to the CPSC by the manufacturer; we have no definitive proof that this image is in the public domain. --krimpet⟲ 10:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
 Lemme know how that double-standard troll-enabling philosophy works out for you. Meanwhile, a good dose of common sense would work out better here on Wikipedia instead of carrying water for trolls. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 13:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 :As I commented on my talk page I wasn't reffering to your interactions with TruthCrusader, I was reffering to your interactions with Krimpet. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 13:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
+:::::I have NO idea what Calton is talking about. But yet again he has left another personal attack on my talk page. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TruthCrusader]. I think he is possibly being trolled by someone and for whatever reason he sees fit to falsely blame me. In any event his personal attack on my talk page, coming so soon on the heels of a ban he got for the exact same thing, i think warrents some kind of action beyind a warning. Thank you and I am sorry this is getting ugly. [[User:TruthCrusader|TruthCrusader]] 17:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 == [[:Image:Eyes of Jimbo.gif]] ==