Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
I‌ think it's copyrighted screenshot too. [[User:OsamaK|OsamaK]] 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I‌ think it's copyrighted screenshot too. [[User:OsamaK|OsamaK]] 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Good lord. Well, I can maybe pixelize the video being played, or just black it out completely? --'''[[User:TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC" face="Fixedsys">TV</font>]]<font color="9900CC">-</font>[[User talk:TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC" face="Fixedsys">VCR</font>]]''' <small>''[[Special:Contributions/TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC">watch</font>]]''</small> 13:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Good lord. Well, I hope what I have just done satisfies. --'''[[User:TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC" face="Fixedsys">TV</font>]]<font color="9900CC">-</font>[[User talk:TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC" face="Fixedsys">VCR</font>]]''' <small>''[[Special:Contributions/TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC">watch</font>]]''</small> 13:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


==== [[:Image:Dd NguyenKhanh.jpg]] ====
==== [[:Image:Dd NguyenKhanh.jpg]] ====

Revision as of 13:52, 1 November 2007

says both copyright, used with permission, and PD - what's correct? Calliopejen1 00:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

says pd-self but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

says pd-self, but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

looks like a scan of a copyrighted news article Calliopejen1 01:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"with express permission" sounds more like {{db-i3}} than {{PD-release}}. Source link, [1], is now dead, and the archived versions at [2] contain no notice of copyright release. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I‌ think it's copyrighted screenshot too. OsamaK 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"permission given by http://ngothelinh.150m.com/ for Free License" sounds more like {{db-i3}} than {{GFDL}}. No OTRS record of this permission. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear from the summary if the uploader actually created this image. Rettetast 08:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

looks like a publicity photo. Uploaders only contribution Rettetast 08:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

looks like a puplicity photo Rettetast 09:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image page needs to feature the "pui" template (not discursive comments by uploader & other users re: my objection in placing the template in the first place). That template should not have been deleted (same objections pertain); the image page itself should not be protected; it needs further work. The image page needs better description, clearer templates, and should be more like Image:Nobel medal dsc06171.jpg (though I still dispute the "public domain in the U.S." template tag there). Both of these images have current entry in Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Nobel Prize (R) Medal images. See also Talk:Nobel Prize and Talk:Nobel Prize in Physics, as well as Nobel Prize in Physics#The award, for comparisons. GFDL-compatible licenses do not seem appropriate for either of these images, whose "non-free content" is still disputed. --NYScholar 10:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC) --Updated. --NYScholar 11:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]