Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 1: Difference between revisions
K6plqr915nsd (talk | contribs) |
K6plqr915nsd (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I think it's copyrighted screenshot too. [[User:OsamaK|OsamaK]] 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
I think it's copyrighted screenshot too. [[User:OsamaK|OsamaK]] 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Good lord. Well, I |
*'''Comment''' Good lord. Well, I hope what I have just done satisfies. --'''[[User:TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC" face="Fixedsys">TV</font>]]<font color="9900CC">-</font>[[User talk:TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC" face="Fixedsys">VCR</font>]]''' <small>''[[Special:Contributions/TV-VCR|<font color="9900CC">watch</font>]]''</small> 13:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
==== [[:Image:Dd NguyenKhanh.jpg]] ==== |
==== [[:Image:Dd NguyenKhanh.jpg]] ==== |
Revision as of 13:52, 1 November 2007
says both copyright, used with permission, and PD - what's correct? Calliopejen1 00:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
says pd-self but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
says pd-self, but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
looks like a scan of a copyrighted news article Calliopejen1 01:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
"with express permission" sounds more like {{db-i3}} than {{PD-release}}. Source link, [1], is now dead, and the archived versions at [2] contain no notice of copyright release. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I think it's copyrighted screenshot too. OsamaK 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Good lord. Well, I hope what I have just done satisfies. --TV-VCR watch 13:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
"permission given by http://ngothelinh.150m.com/ for Free License" sounds more like {{db-i3}} than {{GFDL}}. No OTRS record of this permission. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Unclear from the summary if the uploader actually created this image. Rettetast 08:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
looks like a publicity photo. Uploaders only contribution Rettetast 08:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
looks like a puplicity photo Rettetast 09:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The image page needs to feature the "pui" template (not discursive comments by uploader & other users re: my objection in placing the template in the first place). That template should not have been deleted (same objections pertain); the image page itself should not be protected; it needs further work. The image page needs better description, clearer templates, and should be more like Image:Nobel medal dsc06171.jpg (though I still dispute the "public domain in the U.S." template tag there). Both of these images have current entry in Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Nobel Prize (R) Medal images. See also Talk:Nobel Prize and Talk:Nobel Prize in Physics, as well as Nobel Prize in Physics#The award, for comparisons. GFDL-compatible licenses do not seem appropriate for either of these images, whose "non-free content" is still disputed. --NYScholar 10:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC) --Updated. --NYScholar 11:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)