User talk:Cyborg Ninja/Archive 1

Raphael

My goodness, once again I find you, Ze Raphael...and at the very end of your forced break. You will never ever rub any blisters on your heel, the way you do go on so in your efforts. And if you keep your head up, you will never have a tarted visage.

"Ze Raphael?" I guess this is an embarrassing mistake on your part. LOL @ "tarted visage." Cyborg Ninja

Image:Syringomyelia.jpg

Where did you get this picture??? It looks exactly like me and my MRI. 66.109.248.114 01:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Um, it's an image of my own spine. If you click on pictures on this site, you are led to a page where you can read more about the image. For mine, I added a caption. You should read it. BTW, how the heck do you expect me to get back to you or are you watching me? - Cyborg Ninja 16:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, maybe I'm just checking.66.109.248.114 20:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Your speedy closing of AfD discussion

You have recently closed a deletion discussion about Oleg Kashin after just a few hours and few people telling their opinions. No justification of this person notability has been provided by any of this discussion participants. According to WP policies, [1] "A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards...", and so on.

Basically, we need an independent third-party publication claiming that a person is notable. So far, we have none about Kashin. We have: (a) his own publications, (b) his biography (written probably by him) at one of places of his employment (a kind of standard CV) - reference 1; and (c) two his interviews in non-notable sources (two other references). In these interviews, he tells about himself whatever he wants. Could you please justify your decision?Biophys 12:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

You are telling "WP:SNOW". So, your argument is "ignore all rules". But you forget to count my vote and did not allow others to vote by closing AfD in 4 hours.Biophys 19:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Thin (body)

This redirect has been deleted again by me. Sorry, I had not noticed that it had been previously deleted, as I followed a redlink.- Gilliam 23:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for your contribution in the deletion discussion: regarding the World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting. No amount of reason so far has seemed to work with the nominator. Rray 04:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not practice WP:Point

There is no need to send me a post like that. I am trying to do best by Wikipedia. Your demeaning legitimate editors harms Wikipedia and causes ill will for no reason. --Mattisse 03:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

According to the example given (discussion page), you did indeed have an agenda, which was to get rid of the article because the subject matter is inherently racist. - Cyborg Ninja 03:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do no read other people's minds. It is not clear what you are accusing me of, except trying to improve articles in my profession, of which it seems you disapprove. I am sure that you will put plenty of energy into helping out the article Drapetomania now. And I achieved my aim, as the owner of the article just now deleted the link I objected to, which was all I wanted. (He would not allow it to be removed before, and sometimes it is necessary on Wikipedi to go in a round about way to get things done - so I succeeded from my point of view.) With your help now, I'm sure the Drapetomania article will soon be vastly improved. Mattisse 03:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

With your pathetic passive-aggressiveness, I'm sure Wikipedia will never reach perfection. - Cyborg Ninja 03:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Drapetomania

Sorry about that. I don't know much about the history of psychiatry, and Cartwright's paper describes drapetomania as a medical condition. I'll restore your source. Sorry again. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 05:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD

Nomination to delete List of GLB People from Wikipedia by David Fuchs - Cyborg Ninja 00:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

And the point of posting a link on my own page about a discussion I myself created was...? I'm kinda confused here. David Fuchs ^(talk) 11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

For other users. - Cyborg Ninja 14:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Posting the link really serves no point besides a wierd type of canvassing. There is nothing on my user talk page or user page that relates at all to the AfD. David Fuchs ^(talk) 19:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

That's why I added it. You made the nomination and I think it should be discussed on your talk page once the AfD has closed. It's the same as other users having access to viewing your contributions. - Cyborg Ninja 23:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

At Wikipedia, we comment on content, not users. What aspects of the nomination do you think should be discussed once the AfD is over? David Fuchs ^(talk) 15:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

It's a discussion about the List itself and the nomination to have it deleted. All of our actions are/should be transparent on Wikipedia. And please, don't cite the "comment on content..." Obviously there are exceptions. I can think of the Perverted Justice head off the top of my head. Though this was about content and your reasoning. - Cyborg Ninja 20:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh, so I can't cite Wikipedia's policies? This is news to me... I fully explained my reasoning on the AfD page. I suggest you read it there, instead of at best, putting a random and superflous (not to mention improperly placed) note on my talk page. Talk pages are not meant for people to place breadcrumbs. David Fuchs ^(talk) 22:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by "can't cite Wikipedia's policies?" Like I said previously, I merely wanted to discuss your reasoning beyond the AfD (which will eventually be closed) and have other users discuss it as well. I think you are assuming other motives because of my comments on the AfD itself. While I'm not about to tag AfD's to millions of Talk pages, I do think a List that has been nominated multiple times, for the same reasons, should be open for discussion beyond a few days. The AfD's are discussed on the List's page, but I'd like to discuss it on your page as well. That is all. We are going around in circles. - Cyborg Ninja 22:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

"Comment on content, not on the contributor" -> from WP:NPA. That's Wikipedia policy. David Fuchs ^(talk) 23:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Notification for other users who view this talk page: David Fuchs has since posted about me on AN, to which I have kindly let resolve on its own rather than requiring intervention from administrators who have more important things to worry about. Even before that, I had not raised any further objections to David Fuchs' deleting my commentary from his Talk page, even though it is against Wikipedia policy. David Fuchs also lied saying that I "threatened" another user on the AN, which is in no way true. I only told that user that they were not allowed to delete commentary on their Talk pages from other users per Wikipedia policy. I think his incorrect interpretation is from somewhere in another section on this Talk page. Also bear in mind that he posted an "outside view" on an RfC for another user soon after the comment I made on his Talk page. I have not raised objections to it on the RfC itself, but feel it should be mentioned here as to his possible motives. That is all that I need to add, for other users who have read false slander about me from David Fuchs. - Cyborg Ninja 23:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

What was this for?

That AFD was ages ago. Why did you post a link to it on my talk page? Melsaran (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

For the knowledge of other user's on this site. They can determine what to do with that. - Cyborg Ninja 14:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Also, you are not allowed to pick-and-choose edit what other users add to your Talk page. I noticed you went ahead and did that. I'll let it go, but I have a watch out. - Cyborg Ninja 03:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:Point

Was there a particular reason why you think I may not have not read WP:POINT? --Gavin Collins 14:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Not only have other users noticed your crusade, but so have the administrators. - Cyborg Ninja 14:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Explain how this specifically applies to me? --Gavin Collins 15:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop personal attacks. They violate the codes of Wikipedia. Mattisse 15:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the wrong template but you get the drift. Please stop attacking me and focus on the article and it's problems instead. Consider this a warning. I will find the right template and add it. --Mattisse 15:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

I have never attacked you, though you continue to do so to me and other users that disagree with you on the Drapetomania article and the AfD you nominated. This has been told to you several times. - Cyborg Ninja 15:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please stop the personal attacks. Mattisse 15:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse 2

Please do not add signatures on behalf of other users, as you did here. Thanks. John254 04:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I notified Malik on his talk page. I didn't consider that to be an added signature and I'm not the one who moved the RfC to "approved" -- I listed it as not currently approved because I considered myself the sole signature. I was only adding him to the list of people who tried talking to the subject. If the template is ambiguous, it should be changed. - Cyborg Ninja 05:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for getting this started. I added a lot of specific diff's documenting Mattisse's abuses and I asked John254 to reconsider. If nobody is willing to respond to the RfC, I may report her at AN/I. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 05:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

No, thank you. You made the RfC a lot clearer. It'll be easier for people who were outside the argument to know what was going on. It's a lot of work too, having to go back and forth to get the links for evidence. You might be interested in knowing that Mattisse had dozens of sockpuppets before. I was surprised when I saw it mentioned in her first RfC. BTW, I don't think I would have gone as far as an RfC if Mattisse hadn't tried to have me blocked for false pretenses and attacked you with that racism bit. Probably some kind of arbitration for the article instead. Seems kinda strange that anybody would try to claim a man named after Malcolm X is prejudiced against African-Americans. - Cyborg Ninja 05:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

When filing an RFC against an editor, you must notify the editor so that they can present a response to the allegations. John254 05:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

According to WP:RFC, that is a suggestion. I have reviewed the other RfCs listed, and many are not reported to their users or commented on by them. - Cyborg Ninja 05:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

By the way, please keep this to the discussion page for the RfC. It doesn't belong here. - Cyborg Ninja 05:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Despite my disappointment with the outcome at the RfC, I've decided to move on and let the matter go. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 19:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't plan on going on much about it anymore, but I don't like the character assassinations. Though other people at the RfC are worse than Mattisse. She's distraught over the sockpuppet mention though I only talked about it in reply to someone else. I don't wish for her to leave. All I can say is that she is overreacting, and I suppose it's not my concern at this point, as long as I can edit in safety. - Cyborg Ninja 19:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

re AfD re "List of GLB people"

Your actions and comments regarding the above has been the subject of a section at WP:AN. I do not understand why you are attempting to continue the discussion at various editors talkpages. The AfD was closed as Speedy Keep, so why keep it going? Unless you have evidence of another editor having an agenda that violates Wikipedia policy (which should be reported to the appropriate venue, with diffs) I would comment that promoting the directing of comment to another contributors talkpage, where you disagree with sentiments expressed by said editor, constitutes harassment. I would urge you to either formalise your concerns or to stop your actions. LessHeard vanU 23:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I had since stopped my actions after objections were made on this Talk page, as you could see above. I also noticed that the users erased it from their Talk pages and I let it go. I am offended that an AN would be raised about this, especially after my repeated contributions to Wikipedia over several years. Raising the issue on a user's talk page was a "kinder" and "gentler" approach than notifying administrators. Again, I find this highly offensive and in bad faith. - Cyborg Ninja 23:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, well, I apologise for reading the Noticeboard and trying to seek some answers and generally helping out. If you are not proceeding with these actions then I will mark the section as resolved. Please don't waste your time thanking me... Whatever. LessHeard vanU 23:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I meant that the AN itself was "highly offensive," not you. I assumed you were admin notifying me about it. Sorry for any misunderstanding. I do thank you for notifying me. - Cyborg Ninja 23:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Now at WP:ANI

I would draw your attention to this comment made by me to a posting at ANI. I will raise the matter at the other editors talkpage, requesting that they do not include you as a party in these matters. LessHeard vanU 23:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't planning on bringing it up with administration, but I do want to stay as a party for the RfC that I made about Mattisse. I really find it absurd that she continues to claim I've personally attacked her. I have made dozens of contributions to the drapetomania article and have remained civil to her. I've only made objections to her editing and the AfD which she admitted was for ulterior motives. If someone disagrees with her, she seems to claim they're attacking her. I can only speak for myself, though. I know you're just informing me about the AN/I, but I think I should add a little more info, even though it's getting redundant. - Cyborg Ninja 23:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I have blocked you for 24 hours for the resumption of your trolling of User:Mattisse per this comment at [[User:Blueboar]'s talkpage, which I have taken as a personal attack. I would again refer you to WP:NPA "Comment on content, not on the contributor". Please use the appropriate venues to voice your concerns regarding Mattisses editing in future. LessHeard vanU 20:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)