Talk:Aussie: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:41, 4 November 2007

Songs Redirect‑class

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Australia Redirect‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Aussie is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

The chant looks like Oggy Oggy Oggy -- a spin-off?

Please Explain!

The section on Aussie as a cultural moniker reads like a defenseve attack upon a so-called "radical egalitarian movement" and goes on to throw in a comment regarding legal the "fictions of arbitrary citizenship status". The paragraph whiffs of polemic and needs cleaning up. mangonorth

The argument (where it should not be an argument but description of facts) posits that it is not the nationalists that are being exclusive in their use of the word Aussie. This seems to fly in the face of their obvious intentions!

As Chant?

I have removed the lengthy description of the "Aussie" chant, as there is already an independant page on this topic. As the chant is a relatively new phenomenon, (and one that has been politicized under the current wave of nationalism,) it should not dominate a description of a word that has broader, long standing and more inclusive meaning. mangonorth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.228.152.208 (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of 'Aussie' as ethnic descriptor

Article states:

"While attempts by schools, politicians and the media to use the term as an all encompassing label for those with Australian citizenship, it has continued to retain common usage as an ethnic descriptor, especially among youth."

Are these claims regarding common usage and usage among youth verifiable? --Salada 10:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

....Salada, it is not verifiable. It is strictly a 'slang' term which is normally used only in informal conversation or communication; for example in speaking with another Australian I might use the words "we Aussies", but any attempt to formalise the word as a substitute for "Australians" as a descriptor of those holding Australian citizenship would be met with derision.Geoffrey Wickham 05:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a white Australian born and raised in Australia, and only 20 years old, I would say that "Aussie" refers to anyone who identifies themselves as Australian, and accepts and respects "Australian Values" (or "Aussie Values") and way of life.

Use of the word "Aussie"

Article states:

"In New Zealand and the United Kingdom the term is sometimes used to refer to the country of Australia, as well as Australian persons. In Australia itself the term is only used to refer to its inhabitants."

Does anyone agree with this? I am an Australian and I have heard a number of people use "Aussie" to refer to the country. Should this un-substantiated claim be removed from the article?

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{WP Australia|class=Start|importance=Low}}
 The chant looks like [[Oggy Oggy Oggy]] -- a spin-off?
+==Please Explain!==
+The section on Aussie as a cultural moniker reads like a defenseve attack upon a so-called "radical egalitarian movement" and goes on to throw in a comment regarding legal the "fictions of arbitrary citizenship status".
+The paragraph whiffs of polemic and needs cleaning up. [[mangonorth]]
+The argument (where it should not be an argument but description of facts) posits that it is not the nationalists that are being exclusive in their use of the word Aussie. This seems to fly in the face of their obvious intentions!
 ==As Chant?==