Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
To apply to the school, an applicant had to have a minimum GPA of 2.5. The applicant's [[Medical College Admissions Test]] score, GPA, letters of recommendation, extracurricular activities and other biographical data as well as an interview were also rated by five committee members to produce a benchmark score out of 500. |
To apply to the school, an applicant had to have a minimum GPA of 2.5. The applicant's [[Medical College Admissions Test]] score, GPA, letters of recommendation, extracurricular activities and other biographical data as well as an interview were also rated by five committee members to produce a benchmark score out of 500. |
||
Minority applicants, on the other hand, went through a different admissions process. Minority applicants who checked a box stating they wished to be considered as "economically and/or educationally disadvantaged" applicants were directed to the separate admissions committee. Minority applicants did not have to meet the 2.5 GPA requirements of regular applicants. Minority applicants competed for 16 seats out of 100 among each other and were insulated from competition from the regular applicant pool. Several white applicants applied to the special program, but none received an offer of admission through the special program. |
Minority applicants, on the other hand, went through a different admissions process. Minority applicants who checked a box stating they wished to be considered as "economically and/or educationally disadvantaged" applicants were directed to the separate admissions committee. Minority applicants did not have to meet the 2.5 GPA requirements of regular applicants. Minority applicants competed for 16 seats out of 100 among each other and were insulated from competition from the regular applicant pool. Several white applicants applied to the special program, but none received an offer of admission through the special program.ya right |
||
Bakke applied to the school in 1973 and 1974 and was denied both times. In 1973 he had a benchmark score of 468 out of 500, but no regular applicants were admitted after him with a score below 470. Bakke, however, was not considered for four special admissions slots which had not yet been filled. Bakke wrote a letter of complaint to Dr. George H. Lowrey, the Associate Dean and Chairman of the Admissions Committee, complaining the special admissions program was not what it claimed to be (a program to help the underprivileged), but a racial and ethnic quota. |
Bakke applied to the school in 1973 and 1974 and was denied both times. In 1973 he had a benchmark score of 468 out of 500, but no regular applicants were admitted after him with a score below 470. Bakke, however, was not considered for four special admissions slots which had not yet been filled. Bakke wrote a letter of complaint to Dr. George H. Lowrey, the Associate Dean and Chairman of the Admissions Committee, complaining the special admissions program was not what it claimed to be (a program to help the underprivileged), but a racial and ethnic quota. |
||
Revision as of 00:14, 28 November 2007
| Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued October 12, 1977 Decided June 28, 1978 | |
| Full case name | Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke |
| Citations | 438 U.S. 265 (more) 98 S. Ct. 2733; 57 L. Ed. 2d 750; 1978 U.S. LEXIS 5; 17 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1000; 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8402 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. Bakke v. Regents of University of Cal., 18 Cal. 3d 34, 132 Cal. Rptr. 680, 553 P.2d 1152, 1976 Cal. LEXIS 336 (1976) |
| Holding | |
| The Court held that while affirmative action systems are constitutional, a quota system based on race is unconstitutional. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Powell, joined by White (Parts I, III-A, V-C only), |
| Majority | , joined by Brennan, Marshall, and Blackmun (Parts I and V-C only) |
| Concur/dissent | Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun |
| Concur/dissent | White |
| Concur/dissent | Marshall |
| Concur/dissent | Blackmun |
| Concur/dissent | Stevens, joined by Burger, Stewart, Rehnquist |
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on affirmative action. It bars quota systems in college admissions but affirms the constitutionality of affirmative action programs giving equal access to minorities.
Case
Allan Bakke applied to the University of California-Davis Medical School. The school had been founded 10 years earlier, in 1968, with an entering class of 50 students. The first class contained three students of Asian descent and 47 white students. Over the next two years, the Medical School designed two admissions programs: one that whites with certain criteria would be admitted through and another special program designed for minority applicants. To apply to the school, an applicant had to have a minimum GPA of 2.5. The applicant's Medical College Admissions Test score, GPA, letters of recommendation, extracurricular activities and other biographical data as well as an interview were also rated by five committee members to produce a benchmark score out of 500.
Minority applicants, on the other hand, went through a different admissions process. Minority applicants who checked a box stating they wished to be considered as "economically and/or educationally disadvantaged" applicants were directed to the separate admissions committee. Minority applicants did not have to meet the 2.5 GPA requirements of regular applicants. Minority applicants competed for 16 seats out of 100 among each other and were insulated from competition from the regular applicant pool. Several white applicants applied to the special program, but none received an offer of admission through the special program.ya right
Bakke applied to the school in 1973 and 1974 and was denied both times. In 1973 he had a benchmark score of 468 out of 500, but no regular applicants were admitted after him with a score below 470. Bakke, however, was not considered for four special admissions slots which had not yet been filled. Bakke wrote a letter of complaint to Dr. George H. Lowrey, the Associate Dean and Chairman of the Admissions Committee, complaining the special admissions program was not what it claimed to be (a program to help the underprivileged), but a racial and ethnic quota.
In 1974 Bakke again applied to the school and received a score of 549 out of 600. His lowest score of 86 was from Dr. Lowrey, who found Bakke "rather limited in his approach" to the problems of the medical profession, and was disturbed by Bakke's "very definite opinions, which were based more on his personal viewpoints than upon a study of the total problem[1]" In both years that Bakke applied, minority applicants were admitted under the "special admissions" program with GPAs, MCAT scores and benchmark scores significantly lower than Bakke's.
Bakke then filed suit in the Superior Court of California seeking an injunction to allow him into the medical school claiming that the school had discriminated against him on the basis of his race and thus violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the California Constitution, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The California Supreme Court favored Bakke, in a vote of eight to one, and the university appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Decision
Handed down on June 23, 1978, the decision of the Court was announced by Justice Lewis Powell. The court ruled 5-4 that race could be one, but only one, of numerous factors used by discriminatory boards, like those of college admissions. Powell found that quotas insulated minority applicants from competition with the regular applicants and were thus unconstitutional because they discriminated against regular applicants. This was an example of reverse discrimination. Powell however stated that universities could use race as a plus factor. He cited the Harvard College Admissions Program which had been filed as an amicus curiae as an example of a constitutionally valid affirmative action program which took into account all of an applicant's qualities including race in a "holistic review."
The decision was indeed split with four justices firmly against all use of race in admissions processes, four justices for the use of race in university admissions, and Justice Powell, who was against the UC Davis Medical School quota system of admission, but found that universities were allowed to use race as a factor in admission. The nature of this split opinion created controversy over whether Powell's opinion was binding. However, in 2003 in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court affirmed Powell's opinion.
After eight months, a vote of 5-4 decided that Bakke be admitted to the medical school at Davis.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 438
- [[[1]Maryann Zihala in Rights, Liberties & the Rule of Law (2004) p 89]]
External links
Works related to Regents of University of California v. Bakke at Wikisource