Jump to content

Talk:Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
closing RM discussion; page moved
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP Adventist|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WP Adventist|class=stub|importance=low}}


==Requested move==
{{move|Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists}}
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''


{{{result|The result of the {{{type|proposal}}} was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -~![[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup>
==Requested move==
<hr/>
[[Georgia-Cumberland Conference]] → [[Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists]] — Official name, and also I think it is good to have the church name in there - "Seventh-day Adventist" or similar —[[User:Colin MacLaurin|Colin MacLaurin]] ([[User talk:Colin MacLaurin|talk]]) 13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[[Georgia-Cumberland Conference]] → [[Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists]] — Official name, and also I think it is good to have the church name in there - "Seventh-day Adventist" or similar —[[User:Colin MacLaurin|Colin MacLaurin]] ([[User talk:Colin MacLaurin|talk]]) 13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


Line 15: Line 18:
===Discussion===
===Discussion===
:''Any additional comments:''
:''Any additional comments:''
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->



==Article Rating==
==Article Rating==

Revision as of 01:48, 4 December 2007

WikiProject iconSeventh-day Adventist Church Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:
  • Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself
  • Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -~!GTBacchus(talk)


Georgia-Cumberland ConferenceGeorgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists — Official name, and also I think it is good to have the church name in there - "Seventh-day Adventist" or similar —Colin MacLaurin (talk) 13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article Rating

Does anybody think that this article should be upgraded to start class, since i added some History and list of Presidents I though it really wasn't a stub anymore. Just a thought. Hatmatbbat10 05:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]