Talk:Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Georgia-Cumberland Conference to Talk:Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists: per move request; see talk page for discussion |
closing RM discussion; page moved |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP Adventist|class=stub|importance=low}} |
{{WP Adventist|class=stub|importance=low}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{move|Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists}} |
|||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
{{{result|The result of the {{{type|proposal}}} was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -~![[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> |
|||
⚫ | |||
<hr/> |
|||
[[Georgia-Cumberland Conference]] → [[Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists]] — Official name, and also I think it is good to have the church name in there - "Seventh-day Adventist" or similar —[[User:Colin MacLaurin|Colin MacLaurin]] ([[User talk:Colin MacLaurin|talk]]) 13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC) |
[[Georgia-Cumberland Conference]] → [[Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists]] — Official name, and also I think it is good to have the church name in there - "Seventh-day Adventist" or similar —[[User:Colin MacLaurin|Colin MacLaurin]] ([[User talk:Colin MacLaurin|talk]]) 13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
||
:''Any additional comments:'' |
:''Any additional comments:'' |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> |
|||
==Article Rating== |
==Article Rating== |
Revision as of 01:48, 4 December 2007
![]() | Seventh-day Adventist Church Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -~!GTBacchus(talk)
Georgia-Cumberland Conference → Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists — Official name, and also I think it is good to have the church name in there - "Seventh-day Adventist" or similar —Colin MacLaurin (talk) 13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support. I support that, right now it's where Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-Day Adventist redirects to the current article. I agree that church name should be in there. Hatmatbbat10 (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support. The proposed new article title is a much better one, it's accurate, unambiguous and recognisable by far more people than the old one. Andrewa (talk) 11:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Article Rating
Does anybody think that this article should be upgraded to start class, since i added some History and list of Presidents I though it really wasn't a stub anymore. Just a thought. Hatmatbbat10 05:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)