Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
I love entei (talk | contribs) Talked |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' or '''Merge''' into [[Black & Decker]]. --'''''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]''''' 19:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' or '''Merge''' into [[Black & Decker]]. --'''''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]''''' 19:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Wikipedia is not a forum for posting stubs about every product now or in the past made by every company in the world. If one has references to satisfy [[WP:N]], meaning substantial coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources, then it might merit an article. This one references only the manufacturer, so it does not at this point satisfy the notability guideline. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 19:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Wikipedia is not a forum for posting stubs about every product now or in the past made by every company in the world. If one has references to satisfy [[WP:N]], meaning substantial coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources, then it might merit an article. This one references only the manufacturer, so it does not at this point satisfy the notability guideline. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 19:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I know it's not very notable. However, it is produced by a notable company. Why is it every article I create get's attacked? ([[User:I love entei|I love entei]] ([[User talk:I love entei|talk]]) 21:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 21:22, 23 December 2007
- Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable product, wikipedia isn't indescriminate list of products. Pharmboy (talk) 13:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, no indication that this particular model of vacuum cleaner is notable. Lankiveil (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC).
- Speedy delete as spam. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge into Black & Decker. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a forum for posting stubs about every product now or in the past made by every company in the world. If one has references to satisfy WP:N, meaning substantial coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources, then it might merit an article. This one references only the manufacturer, so it does not at this point satisfy the notability guideline. Edison (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I know it's not very notable. However, it is produced by a notable company. Why is it every article I create get's attacked? (I love entei (talk) 21:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC))