Talk:2007 IIHF World Ranking: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Move to 2007: oppose |
closing RM discussion; no consensus to move page |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Point System== |
==Point System== |
||
Can someone please explain the point system for the IIHF rankings? Thanks. [[User:RiverHockey|RiverHockey]] 18:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
Can someone please explain the point system for the IIHF rankings? Thanks. [[User:RiverHockey|RiverHockey]] 18:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Move to 2007== |
==Move to 2007== |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
{{{result|The result of the {{{type|proposal}}} was}}} '''No consensus''' to move the page, per comments below. There appears to be a convention in place for how to deal with these articles, and it seems to be working. If there's later a consensus to change that convention, then we'll do so. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 02:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<hr/> |
|||
⚫ | |||
This hsould be renamed because it only deals with 2007. [[Special:Contributions/70.55.85.211|70.55.85.211]] ([[User talk:70.55.85.211|talk]]) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
This hsould be renamed because it only deals with 2007. [[Special:Contributions/70.55.85.211|70.55.85.211]] ([[User talk:70.55.85.211|talk]]) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose'''. The method adopted is a good one; The unqualified article deals with current rankings; Other articles eg [[2006 IIHF World Ranking]] and [[2005 IIHF World Ranking]] deal with previous years. When the next rankings are announced, that's the time to create the 2007 article. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 09:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose'''. The method adopted is a good one; The unqualified article deals with current rankings; Other articles eg [[2006 IIHF World Ranking]] and [[2005 IIHF World Ranking]] deal with previous years. When the next rankings are announced, that's the time to create the 2007 article. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 09:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> |
Revision as of 02:30, 12 January 2008
Ice Hockey NA‑class | |||||||
|
Point System
Can someone please explain the point system for the IIHF rankings? Thanks. RiverHockey 18:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Move to 2007
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was No consensus to move the page, per comments below. There appears to be a convention in place for how to deal with these articles, and it seems to be working. If there's later a consensus to change that convention, then we'll do so. -GTBacchus(talk) 02:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
{{move|2007 IIHF World Ranking}} This hsould be renamed because it only deals with 2007. 70.55.85.211 (talk) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. The method adopted is a good one; The unqualified article deals with current rankings; Other articles eg 2006 IIHF World Ranking and 2005 IIHF World Ranking deal with previous years. When the next rankings are announced, that's the time to create the 2007 article. Andrewa (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.