User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:24, 6 February 2008

Edit this page

This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tiptoety/Archive 6. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

vn-47

This user talk page has been vandalized 47 times.

Wikimood

[purge]	[edit]

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

AfC

Hi Tiptoety! I noticed that when you review articles at AfC, you seem to be using a different template to others. At the top it might have {{#switch:|accept={{afc a}}|mm={{afc mm}}|#default={{afc r}}}}. What's the score here? I've recently started helping at this page. I find it's a great way to force you to read all the policies! Best regards, MSGJ (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it depends on if i am using the script (which can be found here) or not. If i am using Firefox or IE then i use the script and it auto closes the submission for me. But when i am not using the script i close it myself, and the form in which i do that changes (it depends on which template i can remember off the top of my head). I would recommend using the script as it does it for you nice and easy. If you have any more questions, or if i just confused you even more let me know and i will do my best to help. Cheers! Tiptoety ^talk 23:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wake Forest Demon Deacons football, 1940-1949

I see nothing wrong with this page as it is. I styled this page, as all Wake Forest history pages off of the Florida Gators historical pages. What is wrong with it?Rebajc3 (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with it now, but when you created the article it lacked much needed content and appeared to be more of just statistics (which violates WP:NOT#STATS). But like i said you added the proper information and it looks fine now. Next time i recommend that you use a sandbox to test your article in before creating it. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 23:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin coaching

I just corrected your request as it seemed to be incorrect. I only noticed because I was thinking about adding my name too! MSGJ (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, Thanks! Tiptoety ^talk 23:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I've had to remove that AfC script because, while it was working perfectly at home, it was causing my web browser at work to crash horribly. MSGJ (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Thats odd... well i guess its just doing them by hand now. Tiptoety ^talk 23:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive comments on other's edits.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights sums up the history adequately, and utterly fails elsewhere. My edits were not unconstructive - they might have been hostile, but decidedly not unconstructive.

We have a discussion about the template on at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.197.39.178 (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to WP:AN. Tiptoety ^talk 00:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator

My RfA was successful, and closed with 44 Supports, 6 Opposes, and 1 Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both Rudget and bibliomaniac 1 5 for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 01:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hdt83

Hi, the purpose here is to discuss the actions of hdt83. It appears that he is acting as several users who are all Admins. When I try to edit a post (correcting errors) he not only changes it back to his old post then he blocks me. It appears that he is also Gogo Dodo among others. Please look into this as it hurts wiki. Think about what happens when one person can have access to 5 or more admin accounts and changes correct posts to his only incorrect versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.249.59.241 (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, this is a very big claim, and me as one user can not investigate. I recommend that you bring this up at WP:AN/I where the community and administrators can discuss this issue. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 05:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for you help with this matter

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 Hi, the purpose here is to discuss the actions of hdt83. It appears that he is acting as several users who are all Admins. When I try to edit a post (correcting errors) he not only changes it back to his old post then he blocks me. It appears that he is also Gogo Dodo among others. Please look into this as it hurts wiki. Think about what happens when one person can have access to 5 or more admin accounts and changes correct posts to his only incorrect versions.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.249.59.241|216.249.59.241]] ([[User talk:216.249.59.241|talk]]) 05:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :Um, this is a very big claim, and me as one user can not investigate. I recommend that you bring this up at [[WP:AN/I]] where the community and administrators can discuss this issue. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#00008B;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 05:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
+thank you for you help with this matter