User talk:Proabivouac: Difference between revisions
→Hey: new section |
m →Hey: welcome |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
I noticed you haven't been very active in the past little while. Have you lost interest? |
I noticed you haven't been very active in the past little while. Have you lost interest? |
||
I just wanted to let you know that we all miss you. And if you ever feel like editing again, you're always here. [[User:Mistery Account|Medieval]] [[User talk:Mistery account|Man]] 07:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
I just wanted to let you know that we all miss you. And if you ever feel like editing again, you're always welcome here. [[User:Mistery Account|Medieval]] [[User talk:Mistery account|Man]] 07:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:06, 7 February 2008
Barnstar
IMHO this is very much deserved.
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| For your constant efforts in defending Wikipedia policy and upholding Wikipedia values in spite of severe and unreasonable pressure to desist. •CHILLDOUBT• 12:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Thanks, Chill doubt! I really appreciate it.Proabivouac 20:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 14:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Torah judgement reloaded
You were once involved in the discussion about whether the Banu Qurayza were massacred based/in line with/etc. provisions of the Torah. Some editor has reopened that can and I think you may want to comment ar Talk:Banu_Qurayza#Torah_issue_reloaded. Cheers, Str1977 (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Have a look at this. Str1977 (talk) 19:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment about Durova
A colleague of mine recently pointed out that you were unsure as to why I marked remedy 8 as passing, even though it only had 6 votes and the majority for the case was 7 votes. As I explained on my talk page and questioned on Paul August's, an "abstain" vote lowers the majority for that proposal. You are free to review the relevant portion of the policy for more information. I'm sorry for the confusion. Cbrown1023 talk 23:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
hey pro,you've been away for quite some time from wikipedia.hope that everything is okGrandia01 (talk) 04:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Season's greetings
In my religion this is a time of year for reconciliation. You and I have both worked in the interests of the project from different perspectives. Would you like to talk? DurovaCharge! 01:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Hi Proabivouac!!!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!! I hope you have a successful year to come!!! Best, --Be happy!! (talk) 09:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in my RfA. And yes, I definitely paid close attention to everything that was said in the debate. Where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I do have to admit some concerns with some of your own comments, which I felt were veering a bit towards personal attacks,[1] and I would encourage you to keep this in mind when you participate in RfAs in the future, so you can try to make your comments in a more civil way. It is possible to oppose someone's candidacy, without attacking them personally or stating falsehoods. Anyway, as regards my own adminship, I am going to take it slowly for now -- I'm working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school, double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. I sincerely doubt you'll see anything controversial coming from my new access level. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, though I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are a few more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status. If you do ever have any concerns about my activities as an administrator, I encourage you to let me know. My door is always open. --Elonka 01:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- way to go pro.expect to be disliked.this is what usually happens to honest and no-bullsh** people in this lifeGrandia01 (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey
I noticed you haven't been very active in the past little while. Have you lost interest?
I just wanted to let you know that we all miss you. And if you ever feel like editing again, you're always welcome here. Medieval Man 07:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)