User talk:Seicer

This is my talk page! Heres a few tips: Click the [+] tab to leave me a new message or reply under an existing thread, Sign your comment by using four tildes (~~~~), Feel free to ask me any questions or leave me any comment you wish! This talk page is open for anyone to support, comment about, or criticize any of my current or prior actions. Archives: 2006 | 01 | 02 | 2007 | 03 | 04 | 2008 | 05 | 06 | 07

Email

Hey Seicer - I've just sent you an email :-) Ryan Postlethwaite 23:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seicer

Please smack me hard with this trout.

• As promised, here's your noms - It was an honour to nominate you. Just fill out the questions and transclude at will :-) Ryan Postlethwaite 04:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Ready to rock and roll so I can go to bed :-) Ryan Postlethwaite 05:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Would you like me to transclude it? Ryan Postlethwaite 06:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
    • To where? And much thanks on the nom. It is very much appreciated. It's time to hit the hay myself, a very long day of classes and work tomorrow! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Hehe, it has to be transcluded onto Wikipedia:Requests for adminship which I've done now, so we're live! Best of luck! Ryan Postlethwaite 06:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Seicer, nobody has voted oppose on your RfA. I believe that you are clearly manipulating other editors with mind control, and demand that you stop it at once. --Cheeser1 (talk) 15:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Best wishes on your RfA! I have already cast my vote—best of luck when the time comes for everybody else to do the same ;) Regards, AGK (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I really have no idea what to say. I'm quite speechless actually, and I never imagined that I would receive such unanimous support from other editors and administrators. I find it really quite heartening that so many feel so strongly about my positive contributions that they are willing to forgive for my prior mistakes, and that they have a lot of vested interest in seeing me succeed as a potential administrator. Reading over the comments at my RfA has put a large smile on my face, and has reinforced the notion that my contributions for the past year and a half have been worth it, despite the adversity, personal attacks and harassment that I have endured over the years. Thanks for the gracious comments, they have been very well received, and I will do everything in my vested power to ensure that I uphold the role of an administrator to the highest standard. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I vote no. You have shown you are after power. This is shown by the edits you have made to pages which you clearly have no knowledge or interest in. Please respect others and do not insult people.

Thank you

For your attention to Tudor Chirilă. Well done. Cheers, JNW (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Let me know if anything transpires. I have it on my watchlist as well. Seicer (t | c) 15:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh man, they are at it again. Seems there are two issues here: subject notability and edit warring between rival contributors. Do you want to kick this over to administration noticeboard? Best, JNW (talk) 02:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaced the CSD G1 tag that was removed in prior reverts. seicer | talk | contribs 02:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Holy crap my talkpage makes me thirsty

It's 11am in my frozen tundra world. Friggin jerk. Now I'm thirsty. Just saw your RfA. Looks good. Remember my support #55, which will probably be the one that finally tips the scales in your favor. Don't delete me. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

So now you've seen my userpage. Yep, huge roadgeek. I could read an atlas for hours, you know, for fun. Love how everything connects. Love planning "the trip", love "taking the trip". My last biggie was a 7000+miler. Hit every state east of the Mighty-miss, plus 4 provinces up nort'. Few freeways. Took three weeks, never staying anywhere longer than a day or two. Great fun.

Anywho, take a look back on my userpage and read the "Administrator-y stuff" subsection for your IRC answer. Truth is, I can't. Blocked from my corporate PC that I exclusively edit from. (Ironic,I know). Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

But I stay up into the wee hours of the morning chatting with people from California mostly, at home, alone, with beer in hand. Seicer (t | c) 17:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please assume good faith and stop provoking other editors

Understood and please accept my apology. Bwmoll3 (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. seicer | talk | contribs 18:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Tudor Chirila

Spent some time reviewing the history of the article and the redirect, Tudor Chirilă. I'm prepared to let the article stand as it is but have obviously watchlisted it. I'd recommend forthright use of protection/deletion if more nonsense ensues - unless you have a different recommendation. CIreland (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I put it up to AFD to let others decide. seicer | talk | contribs 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Nuts, just noticed you're not an admin (ever considered it? I'd be happy to nominate given you haven't done anything ridiculously daft in the recent past), I thought you were. Still any advice would be most welcome as you're obviously more familiar with this than me. CIreland (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seicer. :O) seicer | talk | contribs 02:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Well guess that's one more support then. :) CIreland (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

user:Arisedrink

Hi Seicer, I may have misread things but I got the impression that you answered a question on behalf of user:Arisedrink at the BLP noticeboard. Are you both the same person? My apologies in advance if I have misread something as it is late and I've had a few beers. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Seicer != Arisedrink. I thought I had made a reply at BLP/N, given that Maddox is on my watchlist and that I have made edits to it on behalf of BLP/N. It may have been removed by a rogue editor or vandal at one point or another. seicer | talk | contribs 04:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Maddox

Some anon restored the discussion by Peapee which had nothing to do with Maddox [1] WhisperToMe (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Research on the RFA process

Hello, I am an anthropology student researching the Wikipedia Requests for adminship procedure. As you are currently going through this process, I was wondering if you would be willing to answer a few quick questions.

• Do you believe that the current RFA process is an effective way of selecting admins?
• Do you notice a difference between users who are nominated vs selfnoms?
• Is a week an appropriate length for process? Should it perhaps be longer or shorter?
• Do you think the user's status in the community changes while the user is undergoing the RFA process? How about after the RFA process is over?

If you are willing, please leave your answers on my talk page or e-mail them to me.

This research will not be published academically, as this research is primarily to demonstrate the feasibility of doing online ethnography in online only communities such as Wikipedia, though I intend to make my findings available on Wiki. Your name will not be associated with any information you provide in any published work. If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you. --Cspurrier (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll e-mail you a response by Monday. seicer | talk | contribs 02:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Here

I watch the Arb enforcement page- for some reason, and you might want to inform about this:

[2] ——Martin^phi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 02:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure he saw where I and others said that he'd brought it to the wrong place. ——Martin^phi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 02:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, it was more of a civility issue, and a pretty minor one at that. It seems that there may be a possible COI... seicer | talk | contribs 02:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure you know the history here, but there is another diff, an attack directly against Butler by name "making things up on his site." I would hate to have to post on the Arb enforcement page, but what you're missing is that the real PA was this [3], which is much harder to deal with. ——Martin^phi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 02:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm well aware of it. I've kept a watch on SA's edits in the past, as he seems to crop up at WQA and elsewhere quite frequently; plus, he's involved in a discussion at mediation regarding Cold Fusion. But stating someone is "making things up" is a very far reach for a personal attack. seicer | talk | contribs 02:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Well Seicer, this isn't my fight, I was at the Wiquitte page to complain about the general environment. But come on. First, you can't take things entirly out of context, and if you monitor the situation at all, you know at least a small part of it. Second, you have his first comment, that he struck through. Then, you have him saying that TB makes things up on his website. Put it together. Or don't, because you don't have to. If you say something or write something you believe to be true, and I tell you that you are making things up, it is a direct insult. It would not be more insulting to say you were a moron or a liar or deluded. Not in the least. ——Martin^phi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 03:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

After hearing private responses from not only SA and other parties, and after reviewing the edit histories of all parties involved, I feel that my comments may have been a bit misdirected. While I feel that the "moron" comment may have been taken out of context, and that it was not applied towards another editor but instead to a source or other individual, it has the direct effect of criticising those who acknowledge the source -- yourself and Tom, for instance. In other words, while it was not a direct uncivil comment, it was still one that was directed towards a group of individuals that includes those who hold belief in EVP. Please accept my apologies.

As a side note, SA's block was reduced to 12h. seicer | talk | contribs 23:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for saying that, seicer (-: Trouble is one never knows who believes in it and who is just trying to be NPOV, and who is taking umbrage in general, or whatever. You assume I believe in it. ——Martin^phi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 23:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Let me know or let AE know if more issues crop up. I've left Tom a note via e-mail as well. seicer | talk | contribs 00:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes but...

What is the the other editor is a nazi? Boodlesthecat (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC) What about the incessant Jew-baiting this editor spewed at me personally. do you want the diffs? Is that OK, or do only I get a "warning" because I called this despicable anti-Semitic Nazi a Nazi? Whats the deal? I'm very interested to know what WP's policy is on anti-Semitic attacks and rants. Boodlesthecat (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)