Light brown apple moth: Difference between revisions
WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) →Eradication measures in California: There is no evidence that the 300 (mostly incomplete) reports to the government are at all different from the 300 reports to the activist groups. |
|||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
{{main|Light brown apple moth controversy}} |
{{main|Light brown apple moth controversy}} |
||
No one knows how long LBAM has been present in California.[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/03/0] After the moth was confirmed by DNA testing to be present in California in 2007, quarantine measures and a controversial aerial spraying program involving synthetic [[pheromone]]s were begun. [[CDFA]] and [[USDA]] officials described the situation as an emergency, which allowed them to bypass normal rules for the use of [[pesticide]]s, such as the production of a state-required [[environmental impact report]].<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/23/MN9RV77NK.DTL Bills seek to curb pesticide spray over cities]</ref> Public outcry has been significant, especially after an initial round of [[aerial application|aerial spraying]], when |
No one knows how long LBAM has been present in California.[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/03/0] After the moth was confirmed by DNA testing to be present in California in 2007, quarantine measures and a controversial aerial spraying program involving synthetic [[pheromone]]s were begun. [[CDFA]] and [[USDA]] officials described the situation as an emergency, which allowed them to bypass normal rules for the use of [[pesticide]]s, such as the production of a state-required [[environmental impact report]].<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/23/MN9RV77NK.DTL Bills seek to curb pesticide spray over cities]</ref> Public outcry has been significant, especially after an initial round of [[aerial application|aerial spraying]], when over 600 people reported [[Adverse effect|adverse health effects]]. |
||
==References== |
==References== |
Revision as of 04:09, 17 March 2008
Light brown apple moth | |
---|---|
File:LBAM.jpg | |
Epiphyas postvittana (male left, female right) | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
Suborder: | |
Superfamily: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | E. postvittana
|
Binomial name | |
Epiphyas postvittana Walker, 1863
|
The Light brown apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana) (often abbreviated to LBAM) is a leafroller moth belonging to the lepidopteran family Tortricidae.
Identification
Adult moths
Light brown apple moth adults are variable in colour and may be confused with other leafroller moths and similar species. DNA analysis is currently required to positively identify the species. Typical males have a forewing length of 6–10 mm with a light brown area at the base, which is distinguishable from a much darker, red-brown area at the tip. The latter may be absent, with the moth appearing uniformly light brown, as in the females, who have only slightly darker oblique markings distinguishing the area at the tip of the wing. Females have a forewing length of 7–13 mm.
Larvae
Larvae are not easily distinguished from the larvae of other tortricid leafrollers. The first larval instar has a dark brown head; all other instars have a light fawn head and prothoracic plate. Overwintering larvae are darker. First instar larvae are approximately 1.6 mm long, and final instar larvae range from 10–18 mm in length. The body of a mature larva is medium green with a darker green central stripe and two side stripes.
Distribution
The light brown apple moth is a native insect of Australia. It has been introduced and now occurs in New Caledonia, the British Isles, Hawaii where it has lived for more than 100 years, Western Australia and New Zealand. In March 2007 the moth was positively identified by DNA in mainland United States in California across hundreds of miles from Los Angeles to Napa north of San Francisco. The highest concentrations found so far are in Santa Cruz County and the City of San Francisco.
Life cycle
Light brown apple moth pass through three generations annually with a partial fourth generation in some years. The moth has no winter resting stage. There is considerable overlap in the generations. In warmer areas, four or even five[1] generations are completed annually, with major flight periods occurring during September-October, December-January, February–March, and April–May. In cooler climates, the number of complete generations may be reduced to two.
Eggs are laid in clusters of 3–150 on leaves or fruit. A single female might lay hundreds of eggs.[2] Adults produced by the overwintering larval generation emerge during October and November. These give rise to the first summer generation, in which final instar larvae mature between January and mid February. Second generation larvae reach maturity during March and April, and the adults from this generation provide third generation eggs. Normally, the rate of larval development is slowed considerably during the winter, particularly when temperatures approach freezing; thus the majority of larvae over-winter in the prolonged early juvenile phases of the second third, and fourth instars. During this period they normally feed on herbaceous plants. Re-invasion of apple trees takes place during October-December, when moths of the third generation start laying eggs again on apple leaves.
Sex pheromone
Females release a specific blend of sex pheromone to attract males. The blend is a mixture of two compounds (E)-11-tetradedecen-1-yl acetate, comprising 95% of the mixture and (E,E)-9,11-tetradecadien-1-yl acetate comprising the remaining 5% [1]. As an attractant used in moth traps, the synthetic versions of these pheromones are highly specific. Only very closely related species of moths are attracted to the pheromone's scent.[3]
Diet and damage
The insect is highly polyphagous and the larvae feed on numerous horticultural crops in Australia and New Zealand. It is known to feed on 123 dicotyledonous plant species, including 22 Australian natives, belonging to 55 different families. In New Zealand, over 250 host species have been recorded. It feeds on nearly all types of fruit crops, ornamentals, vegetables, glasshouse crops, and occasionally young pine seedlings.[2]
The larvae cause significant damage to foliage and fruit.[3] Early instars feed on tissue beneath the upper epidermis (surface layer) of leaves, while protected under self-constructed silken webs on the undersurface of leaves. Larger larvae migrate from these positions to construct feeding niches between adjacent leaves, between a leaf and a fruit, in the developing bud, or on a single leaf, where the leaf roll develops. The late stage larvae feed on all leaf tissue except main veins.
Superficial fruit damage is common in apple varieties which form compact fruit clusters, though more significant damage may also occur such that crops are no longer commercially viable. Leaves are webbed to the fruit and feeding injury takes place under the protection of the leaf; or larvae spin up between fruits of a cluster. Internal damage to apple, pear, and citrus fruits is less common, but a young larva may enter the interior of an apple or pear fruit through the calyx or beneath the stem of a citrus fruit. Excreta are usually ejected on to the outside of the fruit.
In sharp contrast to most affected regions, the Hawaii Department of Agriculture says the moth "has not been a significant pest in Hawaii" and finds it beneficial in a few cases, because it kills some invasive plants, including gorse and blackberry.[4]
Control
The species has been classified as a noxious insect in the United States and Canada, leading to restrictions on produce from counties with substantial populations. Typical orchard control of the insect commonly involves IPM regimes using a variety of methods such as insecticide applications, biological control and occasionally mating disruption, which typically involves releasing synthetic insect phermones to confuse the male moth's tracking of female scent. This results in fewer pairings and thus fewer offspring. Sex pheromone lures are also often used to assess and monitor populations of moths in specific areas.
Control measures in Australia and New Zealand
The moth is endemic to Australia[4], and its natural predators keep the population in check. It is a pest in New Zealand where various measures, including using natural enemies, insecticides and pheromones (to disrupt mating), have been taken for more than a decade.[5][6]
Eradication measures in California
No one knows how long LBAM has been present in California.[7] After the moth was confirmed by DNA testing to be present in California in 2007, quarantine measures and a controversial aerial spraying program involving synthetic pheromones were begun. CDFA and USDA officials described the situation as an emergency, which allowed them to bypass normal rules for the use of pesticides, such as the production of a state-required environmental impact report.[5] Public outcry has been significant, especially after an initial round of aerial spraying, when over 600 people reported adverse health effects.
References
- California Department of Food and Agriculture LBAM website
- United States Department of Agriculture LBAM website
- ^ Bellas, T.E., Bartell, R.J. and Hill, A. (1983) Identification of two components of the sex pheromone of the moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) Journal of Chemical Ecology 9, 503-511
- ^ Thomas, W. P. (1989) Epiphyas postvittana (Walker), light brown apple moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Pages 187-195 of: A review of biological control of invertebrate pests & weeds in New Zealand (Cameron, P. J., Hill, R. L., Bain, J. and Thomas, W. P., eds) CAB International, London.
- ^ Wearing, C. and Thomas, W. and Dugdale, J. and Danthanarayana, W. (1991) Tortricid pests of pome and stone fruits, Australian and New Zealand species. Pages 453-472 of: Tortricid pests, their biology, natural enemies and control (Van der Geest, L. P. S. and Evenhuis, H. H., eds) Vol 5. Elsevier Amsterdam IBSN 0-444-88000-3.
- ^ "News Release - NR07-09 - May 2, 2007 — Hawaii Department of Agriculture". Retrieved 2008-02-27.
- ^ Bills seek to curb pesticide spray over cities