Template:RFChist list

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

• Talk:Ochamchira - Is a page move request and an associated discussion required before moving page to a new controversial title?
• Talk:List of basic Canada topics - What's missing? How can this list be improved?
• Talk:Ukrainian War of Independence Title and synthesis under it may be in violation of WP:NOR, esp. WP:SYN, and WP:NPOV
• Talk:Defense of Brest Fortress A template with the following warning: "A significant amount of this section's content may actually relate to an entirely different subject." was added to a section of Siege of Brest (1941) article.
• Talk:Zaporozhian Cossacks This statement is supported by Catherine's II manifesto and in historiographic literature
• Talk:Pál Kinizsi the ethnic origin is under dispute, with no proofs on either side
• Talk:Old Style and New Style dates Suggested merge of the new article dual dating into Old Style and New Style dates
• Talk:South Asia Should Tibet be here? Many academic sources say Tibet is South Asian. Also should this article be strictly geopolitical in its definition of South Asia?
• Talk:Army Groups of the National Revolutionary Army Is the accurate translation of 集團軍 as 'Army Group' or 'Group Army'?
• Talk:Abkhazian Soviet Socialist Republic The question is whether the Abkhazian SSR should be mentioned in this template and whether this template should be present in this article.
• Talk:Ante Pavelić Ante Pavelić and the Ustaše have been accused of several crimes during WWII. Do mentioning these in detail violate NPOV in his entry?
• Talk:Mercia Which map should be used for this and related medieval England articles?
• Talk:Psychohistorical views on infanticide This article seems to push a fringe POV, in effect promoting one person's view of things. If this concept is used by historians, does this article provide an acurate NPOV account of it?
• Talk:Psychohistory This article seems to puch a fringe POV, in effect promoting one person's view of things. If there is a real branch of history called psychohistory, does this article provide an acurate NPOV account of it?
• Talk:Bosnian mujahideen A recent AfD ended with no consensus for keep or deletion. Many participants in the discussion recommended renaming/moving the article. Outside opinions are needed to help establish broader consensus and move the discussion forward.
• Talk:Mersey Forest Lets have a discussion about the suitability/notability of the Mersey Forest for Wikipedia - either on its own or in the context of the community forests
• Talk:Sea of Japan Who calls the Sea of Japan the East Sea?
• Talk:List of massacres/Archive 5 dispute over entry in the table on Fallujah. This covers: The type of the sources cited, the time frame of the massacre, and whether an American military POV should be included.
• Talk:Pelasgians#RfC: Pelasgians Albanian section. Heated disputes on article talk page and in its archives indicate that talk page discussions have not resolved the Pelasgians#Albanian section issues which recur. Concerns seem to center on whether the content in the section is accurate, balanced, neutral, and appropriately verified by reliable sources.

For more information, see User:RFC bot