Talk:ITV1

It is officially known as Channel 3

What does this mean? Grant 12:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Legally, the franchise-holders have licenses to broadcast as part of an entity called "Channel 3". In practice, the name is not used in any other context. --Bonalaw 17:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I see. I've now linked it. Grant 23:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

---

Neither of the articles (ITV or ITV1) discuss its style of programming or public perceptions thereof. Like the fact that when ITV celebrated its 50th anniversary some people congratulated it on 30 years of quality programming and 20 years of crap.

Schedule removal

I had to remove the schedule from the article, regardless of its unencyclopedic value (see section 1.7.3. of WP:NOT), schedules from the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 require a royalty fee to be paid to Broadcasting Dataservices (BDS), as per schedule 17 (and not section 17 as I put in the edit history - whoops!) of the Broadcasting Act 1990. A similar situation occurred with the GMTV article not so long ago either.

And I quote from Broadcasting Dataservices:

“ The programme summaries are the subject matter of copyright. The information may only be reproduced pursuant to a licence issued by the copyright owner or pursuant to the statutory licence set out in Schedule 17 of the Broadcasting Act 1990. This ruling affects BBC1, BBC2, ITV and Channel 4 terrestrial channels only. Broadcasting Dataservices is the agent of BBC Worldwide, the ITVA companies and Channel 4 in the matter of issuing copyright licences and collecting copyright fees. ”

Please don't add a schedule back into the article. More information and sources can be found here: Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems#Potential legal issue with UK Radio station schedules within articles --tgheretford (talk) 12:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

This discussion is now archived at: Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/Archive 8#Potential legal issue with UK Radio station schedules within articles --tgheretford (talk) 23:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

See link above as to why the current schedule needs changing to prose or removing which has been added tonight. --tgheretford (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

New Idents

It is rumoured that on Monday 13 November ITV1 will have 5 new idents either replacing or running with the current set, but keeping the logo. Although no source has been given. see this link from TVforum. London UK (talk) 23:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Viewers

cant this article be changed so it is like ITV2? with viewing figs ect, Then any ITV info moved to the ITV article because at the moment we have two articles telling us the same stuff mark999 21:50, 23 february 2007 (UTC)

Nope. ITV1 is not a channel - it is an unofficial name used accross 11 of the 15 regional ITV Network licences. ITV is the article in which you should put viewing figures in.

• ITV incorporates all 15 Channel 3 franchises accross the UK.
• ITV1 incorporates 11 of those 15 Channel 3 franchises ONLY in England in Wales.

Therefore viewing figures are taken nationwide accross the whole of the ITV network. /Marbles 13:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

...And as it is made up of these franchises, they broadcast the ITV1 channel. It is an official name, as they broadcast the IVT1 channel under the ITV1 name. Marbles, you seem to have a real problem with associating brand names with products etc. Freeview, for example, is a service not 'the brand name of a group of companies which provide a service', as people refer to 'Freeview' to easily describe this service. MathiasFox 09:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Its simple. ITV is the channel, ITV1 is the broadcast name used by 12 franchisees. I never said that. ITV1 does not have ratings of its own as it is not UK-wide; ITV does - which is what the user wants to do. And I have not made those claims about Freeview. /Marbles 10:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Except ITV1 is the national name of the channel and the name used onscreen by twelve of the franchises. All of the ITV companies agreed to changed the channel's name to ITV1 in 2001.

I have proven this many times before on Talk:Freeview but a couple of people chose to ignore the blatant evidence. Eventually, a compromise was reached where all of the onscreen names (ITV1, STV and UTV) were used.

Nevertheless, this article is technically inaccurate for saying the ITV1 is only a brand name used by twelve franchises because it is also the national name of the channel. I'm not going to change it because some people will ignore the truth and change it back and, unfortunately for Wikipedia, it is often the most belligerent, not the most accurate, editors than get their way. - Green Tentacle 17:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Schedule Removal (part 2)

I have removed the schedule that has been added, as before AFAICT this contravenes WP:NOT. Secondly the changes deleted a large amount of content on the article Pit-yacker 15:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Just to note, as above and with ITV1, there are also legal complications for the Wikimedia Foundation to have a schedule in this article without making a payment to Broadcasting Dataservices. --tgheretford (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ITV1logo06.png

Image:ITV1logo06.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Section:Programming

This section "Programming" is irrelevant to ITV1 and applies to the WHOLE network, not just the ITV1 regions... shouldn't this be featured in the ITV article? Additionally Corporate Unification should become a sub-level of the History section. /Marbles (talk) 21:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Dubious

I guess I should copy to here my edit comment from when I added the dubious tag against the sentence "It should be noted that outside of ITV plc, ITV is still the official name of the main channel":

"See http://www.itv.com/TVGuide/default.html. The "main" channel is called "ITV1", not "ITV". Newspaper listings are the same. I don't understand what "outside of ITV plc" is meant to signify either" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.245.156 (talk) 01:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)