User talk:78.16.122.227

Discussion

You're not suppose to change things, without discussing it. As you're the one who wants change, it's you who must explain why. GoodDay (talk) 21:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh come on. You'd swear wikipedia was a democracy! All this formal mumbo jumbo. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia! Clearly you know nothing about Ireland and have nothing better to do than stop edits which are factually correct.78.16.122.227 (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Please reconsider. Discuss what you want changed first. GoodDay (talk) 22:11, 29

March 2008 (UTC)

I engage in factually correct edits. Not bureaucracy. Cheers.78.16.122.227 (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually you've engaged in disruption (see below). GoodDay (talk) 22:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

No I haven't. I haven't broken any rules I think you'll find.78.16.122.227 (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I counted 4 reverts - but since you have stopped I am not going to enact a block. Please note that you don't get 3 reverts per 24 hours, it is an upper limit but you can be sanctioned for less. As I am not going to block you I am therefore free to comment; the country is the Republic of Ireland or Eire, but the land mass that includes Eire and the province of Northern Ireland is Ireland. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC) (from the Duchy of Cornwall)

Whoops, too late, I shall have a word with the blocking admin. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm begging you, don't do this. The Administrators are serious, you may get blocked. GoodDay (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

3rr warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Northern Ireland. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --John (talk) 22:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours for edit warring and disruptive editing. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Case (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

78.16.122.227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't broken 3RR so by Wikipedia rules there is no reason for banning me.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I haven't broken 3RR so by Wikipedia rules there is no reason for banning me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I haven't broken 3RR so by Wikipedia rules there is no reason for banning me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I haven't broken 3RR so by Wikipedia rules there is no reason for banning me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}