Jump to content

Bright green environmentalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BOT--Reverting edits by 71.124.214.130 to revision 204888412 (\bblogspot\.com)
Line 32: Line 32:
* [http://www.wie.org/j38/bright-green.asp?page=1 A Brighter Shade of Green: Rebooting Environmentalism for the 21st Century] — [[WIE magazine]]
* [http://www.wie.org/j38/bright-green.asp?page=1 A Brighter Shade of Green: Rebooting Environmentalism for the 21st Century] — [[WIE magazine]]
* [http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,2035002,00.html "Go Bright Green" -- article in the Guardian]
* [http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,2035002,00.html "Go Bright Green" -- article in the Guardian]
* [http://thoughtsonglobalwarmi.decenturl.com/thoughts-on-global-warming Thoughts on Global Warming]


[[Category:Environmentalism]]
[[Category:Environmentalism]]

Revision as of 13:33, 12 April 2008

Dark Greens, Light Greens and Bright Greens

Contemporary environmentalists are often described as being split into three groups, 'Dark' 'Light' and 'Bright' Greens. [1]

Light Greens see protecting the environment first and foremost as a personal responsibility. They fall in on the reformist end of the spectrum, but light Greens do not emphasize environmentalism as a distinct political ideology, or even seek fundamental political reform. Instead they often focus on environmentalism as a lifestyle choice.[2] The motto "Green is the new black." sums up this way of thinking, for many [3] (Though many environmentalists of all stripes use "lite" green to describe products or practices they believe are greenwashing).

In contrast, dark greens believe that environmental problems are an inherent part of industrialized capitalism, and seek to radical political change. As discussed earlier, 'dark greens' tend to believe that dominant political ideologies (sometimes referred to as industrialism) are corrupt and inevitably lead to consumerism, alienation from nature and resource depletion. Dark Greens claim that this is caused by the emphasis on growth that exists within all existing ideologies, a tendency referred to as ‘growth mania’. The dark green brand of environmentalism is associated with ideas of Deep Ecology, Post-materialism, Holism, the Gaia Theory of James Lovelock and the work of Fritjof Capra as well as support for a reduction in human numbers and/or a relinquishment of technology to reduce humanity's impact on the biosphere.

More recently, Bright Green Environmentalists emerged. This group believes that radical changes are needed in the economic and political operation of society in order to make it sustainable, but that better designs, new technologies and more widely distributed social innovations are the means to make those changes-- and that we can neither shop nor protest our way to sustainability[4]. As Ross Robertson writes, "[B]right green environmentalism is less about the problems and limitations we need to overcome than the “tools, models, and ideas” that already exist for overcoming them. It forgoes the bleakness of protest and dissent for the energizing confidence of constructive solutions."[5]

The Origin and Evolution of Bright Green Thinking

The term bright green, first coined in 2003 by writer Alex Steffen, refers to the fast-growing new wing of environmentalism, distinct from traditional forms[6]. Bright green environmentalism aims for a society that relies on new technology and improved design to achieve gains in ecological sustainability without reducing (indeed, increasing) the potential for economic growth[7] and attending to human needs.

Its proponents tend to be particularly enthusiastic about green energy, hybrid automobiles, efficient manufacturing systems, bio and nanotechnologies, ubiquitous computing, dense urban settlements, closed loop materials cycles and sustainable product designs. "One-planet living" is a frequently heard buzz-phrase.[8][9] They tend to focus extensively on the idea that through a combination of well-built communities, new technologies and sustainable living practices, quality of life can actually be improved even while ecological footprints shrink.

The term "bright green" has been used with increased frequency due to the promulgation of its ideas though the Internet and recent coverage in the traditional media.

See also

References

  1. ^ Interview with Alex Steffen, part three | Gristmill: The environmental news blog | Grist
  2. ^ "Celebrities Lead the Way to a Greener Britain". 2006-11-07. Retrieved 2007-05-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ Eco-friendly: Why green is the new black - International Herald Tribune
  4. ^ WorldChanging: Tools, Models and Ideas for Building a Bright Green Future: Don't Just Be the Change, Mass-Produce It
  5. ^ A Brighter Shade of Green: Rebooting Environmentalism for the 21st Century, by Ross Robertson
  6. ^ WorldChanging: Tools, Models and Ideas for Building a Bright Green Future: Reports from the Team
  7. ^ Green schools show New Haven students the lightThe Yale Herald
  8. ^ Bright Green Living wiki mission statement
  9. ^ "On Earth Day", Alex Steffen — Worldchanging website