User talk:Murple

Hello Murple and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
• Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
• Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Research chemical

Hi Murple, in case you're not watching it, just posting a heads-up to discussion I started on Talk:Research chemical. -- Rkundalini 02:26, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Again

Please come and discuss at Talk:Research chemical. The changes you made were confusing and should be redone or at least properly documented on the talk page. -- Rkundalini 04:13, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Psychedelic drug

Looks like some decent changes... except why did you remove the cannabinoids and other sections? Depending on the point of view, cannabis is more "psychedelic" than MDMA. --Thoric 20:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

ayahuasca

hi murple

i reorganized the aya article with your new additions. please discuss any issues you might have with what i did.

i deleted two things: the line in the first paragraph that went "in the minds of non-quechua speaking people"; not that it isn't valid, but that first sentence is awkward already. i suggest you find a less awkward place to work that in, as it seems to be a valid remark. Doctorcito wrote that if you'd like to discuss it with him.

i also got rid of the paragraph about respecting quechua culture. the sentence about the spanish spelling is still there, but the paragraph itself seemed out of place in an ayahuasca article.

IMO the article still needs to be clearer that ayahuasca is the vine and not DMT.

--Heah (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

T. bridgesii

Hi Murple. Thanks for the contribution you made to the T. bridgesii article. On the matter of the "beast" comment....well, I had read it on some websites. It wasn't a nickname used by me and my mates. ;) --Sennaista 17:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Noserove.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Noserove.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

hi, murple

Wondering whether you're the same murple I knew from a long, long time ago. Probably ten years now. Associated with the VPL and another list whose name I now forget. EE? The acronym escapes me. I figure there aren't many "murples" out there with your areas of.. expertise. aa v ^ 08:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anncoulter.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Anncoulter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Ta bu shi da yu 12:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Noserove.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Noserove.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Ta bu shi da yu 12:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Murple (band)

A tag has been placed on Murple (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Murple (band)

A tag has been placed on Murple (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)