Talk:Biljana Srbljanović: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:08, 23 April 2008

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Serbia Start‑class

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Karadžić

Did't she deny that she is related to Radovan Karadžić? --BokicaK 20:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. Nikola 11:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But those links are weak evidence. And further http://blog.b92.net/arhiva/node/4543 --[[User:BokicaK|Bojan]] 17:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She didn't deny it there either. Nikola 08:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, she said that it is attempt at discreditation. We should add that she didn't explicitly deny Slobodna Dalmacija question. -- Bojan 05:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quote reference

The reference put on the quote is wrong. The text is about BS as member of LDP, and there is no such quote in the whole text. Yo'd better find the text where she said this, or remove it.--Maduixa 07:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E deco,tako se to radi

--'''Marko Radovanovic''' 20:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not neutral,but is biased against Srbljanovic.It contains opinions of the person who wrote it, which are superficial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.66.187.154 (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bias Issues

It is biased against Biljana. "Controversies" section isn't supposed to be longer then "Biography" section when we're talking about someone as successful as she is. Serbian version is done in way higher quality.

WHAT?! The controversies section can be as long as it wants to be. That unsigned comment up top can think as much as it wants about successes and so forth, but when someone is controversial, despite their apparent successes (just as an aside, I never heard of her until she insulted Milan Gurovic), their controversies must be mentioned. In short, if her controversies are many, then they should be included. Not including them due to some delusional 'length of article' considerations is, well, delusional. This is a wiki article, it is not a a newspaper article where we have space issues, nor is it her personal campaign page. Accuracy, people! Ganseki (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, somebody doesn't like what she's saying about Serbian society ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.131.64 (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this page is very biased against Biljana, so I would like to add the tag that at the start of the "controversies" section. Saigon from europe (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 16:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
+== Bias Issues ==
-== I also think this is biased ==
 It is biased against Biljana. "Controversies" section isn't supposed to be longer then "Biography" section when we're talking about someone as successful as she is. Serbian version is done in way higher quality.