User talk:Sennen goroshi

Please don't click this (last change).

12:12 Monday 16 September 2024 Please click here to leave a new message for me Apology Sennen, I think I left you a stupid message last time, so I apologize for that. I was kind of dealing with a big mess, and a friend corrected me, reminding me to be more humble, Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC) I don't recall a stupid message, so don't worry about it. I've decided to delete all messages that are not part of an ongoing discussion on my talk page, so people should be able to find their way around a little easier. Sennen goroshi (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Good move, sometimes attracting unnecessary attention to ourselves is not really a good thing, but there are times it is needed. So each person has to decide for themselves when to walk away and when to engage. Igor Berger (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC) While it is a good idea, you might want to consider seeking a transparency in your disputes by creating an archive and simply sending those conversations not on point to the archive. This allows you to sidestep any claim that you are concealing disputes (even though they are still in your edit history). It also protects you if someone is repeatedly uncivil or makes threats to you; you have documented the situation by maintaining it in a watched archive. If you need any help setting that up, let me know. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Yes I agree to that. Archiving is very useful to the editor who is archiving the page and to the community as a whole. transperancy is very important. But this is always an individual editor's choice. Some editors like it others delete what they think will create wikidrama or not important and not archive that section. Which ever you decide, to archive or not, and how to archive, do not archive by editor name you had a discussion with but by date. Igor Berger (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC) As far as I was concerned, I didn't see much difference between deleting and archiving, because deleting does not actually remove the comments, they are still in the history. However, the main reason that I didn't archive, was that I don't know how. I'm sure it's easy, I just have not got round to working out how to do it yet. Sennen goroshi (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Jihad watch Just letting you know that mediation on the in/ex -clusion of Jihad Watch from Cat Anti-Muslim sentiment is now happenning. SmithBlue (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Your vandalism and personal attack. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kimchi, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User_talk:Appletrees. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You're the one vandalising the page with no source to back up your claim for deep shit. Your citation does not prove your vandalism at all. Supporting better version is not a vandalism which suit a personal attack. Please refrain yourself from committing such disruptive behaviors. That harms Wikipedia. Be an editor. Regards--Appletrees (talk) 15:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC) Those sources appeared to me certainly to imply that 'in deep kimchi' is a colloquial expression for 'in deep shit;' they actually do confirm that it means the same thing as that expression, 'in deep trouble.' Maybe, instead of edit warring and insulting each other, you could have a polite conversation about whether this is important and how it could be phrased? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC) History of Korea template Thanks for your changes, I too suspect that is just another sockpuppet account - Schrandit (talk) 17:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC) Your following (A.K.A Wikistalking) You revert Seolleongtang article you've never cared to edit before. You prove me again that you follow me as usual. Kimchi, East Sea, Dokdo and then finally Seolleongtang? Your revert introduces false information with no confirmed google return. You are so confident to say that Badagnani's edit is right and mine is false. I did not know that you're a super quick learner capable of reading Korean two weeks after you declared that you can't read Korean at all and do not waste your time to learn Korean. I prepared some report yesterday on Badagnani's introducing original research to Korean cuisine articles but did not reported because we had talked and solved many conflicts when a dispute arises between us unlike that of you and me. However, you seem to forget that he first initiate to give me absurd vandlism warning twice because I removed his hidden marks as moving them to Talk page? That is trolling and personal attack.You see what you want to see. I have no wish that you would be changed your attitude though. Talking with you is not productive but exhausting myself, so I've choson not to talk with you. I do like to talk with "contrigutors" who creat articles, expand contents with verifiable sources. You are so fond of getting close with me, then why don't you join in editing geographical information of South Korea? You know that I've been creating neighbourhoods and museums of Seoul, and I need more hand to expand them. You're so interested in Korea, you can join in WikiProject Korea. However, you don't even edit Japan in which you're living, so I do not have high expectancy from you. REGARDS. --Appletrees (talk) 11:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the message, actually I went to that particular article, after posting a message on Badagnani's talk page and looking at his edit history, infact if you look at my contrib history, you will see that I edited that article 1 or 2 minutes after putting a message on his page...that fact that you also edited it, well is not pure luck, but more likely to be due to the fact that I, you and Badagnani seem to share an interest in asian food related articles. But another topic, the Korea based articles, I would love to help, however I know so little about Korea. If you would like someone to proof read the articles and help them to be written in a professional manner, than perhaps I would be useful, but when it comes to content I imagine you know so much more than I do, it is your country. Perhaps we could work together on some cuisine based articles, food is a great interest of mine and food articles should be easier for us to edit together, when compared to something like WW2 or Liancourt etc. Sennen goroshi (talk) 15:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Monkey-baiting Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Removing cited information that is factually correct is considered vandalism. Chessy999 (talk) 09:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Please don't template me. That is a polite request. In addition to that, you should be aware that the information removed by myself, is original research and is not backed up by any citation. Don't accuse me of vandalism again. Sennen goroshi (talk) 09:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC) The citation is a book not original research. Chessy999 (talk) 00:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC) The citation is clearly secondary, the cited book was written in modern times, the monkey-baiting events happened 100s of years ago. There is no original research in the final paragraph of the article. Chessy999 (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Sock Blocked :) Black Kite 18:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)