Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 9: Difference between revisions
m →Image:Virgin Killer.jpg: oops |
→Image:Virgin Killer.jpg: I stand by my rationale |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The closing admin's reason was that the image failed NFCC #8. Since all album covers are basically claimed under fair use already, there should be no reason to exclude this one from that rationale. There's even more reason to keep this under fair use due to the controversy it has stirred up in history. The article, [[Virgin Killer]], is full-protected currently, but there is an abundance of material on the talk page that will be used to expand the controversy content, once it's unprotected. The ending tally was roughly 43 to 12, by my count, in favor of '''Keep'''. I feel the closing admin neglected to weigh the arguments given, and did not judge consensus, but rather made a decision based on his or her own opinion of the issue. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Equazcion|<font color="#000">Equazcion</font>]] [[User talk:equazcion|•''✗'']]/[[Special:Contributions/Equazcion|''C'' •]] ''21:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)''</small> |
The closing admin's reason was that the image failed NFCC #8. Since all album covers are basically claimed under fair use already, there should be no reason to exclude this one from that rationale. There's even more reason to keep this under fair use due to the controversy it has stirred up in history. The article, [[Virgin Killer]], is full-protected currently, but there is an abundance of material on the talk page that will be used to expand the controversy content, once it's unprotected. The ending tally was roughly 43 to 12, by my count, in favor of '''Keep'''. I feel the closing admin neglected to weigh the arguments given, and did not judge consensus, but rather made a decision based on his or her own opinion of the issue. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Equazcion|<font color="#000">Equazcion</font>]] [[User talk:equazcion|•''✗'']]/[[Special:Contributions/Equazcion|''C'' •]] ''21:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)''</small> |
||
* I stand by my reasoning in the original close. NFCC says what it says. There's no "album covers excepted" appears when I hover the mouse over the various sections. If enforcing the EDP means we delete a lot of eye-candy, that's what we have to do. The second step will be easier than the first one, and the third easier still. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 21:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Raxivort]]==== |
====[[:Raxivort]]==== |
||
Revision as of 21:49, 9 May 2008
- [[::Image:Virgin Killer.jpg]] (edit | [[Talk::Image:Virgin Killer.jpg|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|IfD)
The closing admin's reason was that the image failed NFCC #8. Since all album covers are basically claimed under fair use already, there should be no reason to exclude this one from that rationale. There's even more reason to keep this under fair use due to the controversy it has stirred up in history. The article, Virgin Killer, is full-protected currently, but there is an abundance of material on the talk page that will be used to expand the controversy content, once it's unprotected. The ending tally was roughly 43 to 12, by my count, in favor of Keep. I feel the closing admin neglected to weigh the arguments given, and did not judge consensus, but rather made a decision based on his or her own opinion of the issue. Equazcion •✗/C • 21:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- I stand by my reasoning in the original close. NFCC says what it says. There's no "album covers excepted" appears when I hover the mouse over the various sections. If enforcing the EDP means we delete a lot of eye-candy, that's what we have to do. The second step will be easier than the first one, and the third easier still. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Raxivort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
This article was apparently speedy deleted in March 2007. I don't know what was on it previously, but I was wondering if it could be restored. If it can be shaped into a reasonable article, I would like to do so, otherwise I could just merge the text that's there and redirect into List of Greyhawk deities or somewhere else appropriate. I did not contact the deleting admin, because they seem to be no longer an active editor? BOZ (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to that list looks plausible. The deletion was for lack of meaningful content, so unless you have sources for expansion, that is all that really can happen. For comparison, the full content of this approximates the intro paragraph and references sections of Semuanya or Skerrit. GRBerry 19:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- That might be good enough for a start, and I could probably add to it. BOZ (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Parish (Band) (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Deleted again after notability asserted and AfD vote to keep! As per WP:MUSIC#6, I believe notability is asserted. Two members of said group are current and founding members of Crimson Glory, a band whom themselves are at least notable as per WP:MUSIC#5 (Two album released on a major or more important indie label - they released two albums on Roadrunner Records) and WP:MUSIC#12 (Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network - they had a full two-hour concert broadcast across America on Z ROCK Radio from the Manatee Civic Center on Sept. 2, 1989). They could quite possibly meet others, including #3 and #4 as well... 6wolf2112 (talk) 04:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
Ernest Sipes (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
UNDELETE_REASON My name is Frank Bentner and I work at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks. Our University does what little research there is out there on First Nations Alaka Natives and we view our work as important. There is a researcher/published author named Ernest Sipes who is being quoted often at UAF and in academic journals and he is doing a lot of new research on First Nations Peoples. I put a page on him at Wikipedia but it was removed and I don't know why. I read all the causes for deletion and I redid the page but it was removed again yesterday. Can you please review the new page on Ernest Sipes and reinstate it? The new page contain bio info and is somewhat longer than the original page. Thank you, Frank Bentner P.O. Box 3247, University Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska 99707 Tele. (907)458-8510 e-mail: frank_bentner@hotmail.com
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |