Jump to content

Talk:Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 70: Line 70:


:::I consider your edits unconstrutive and have reverted them. Consensus seem to support my opinion. Please to not revert this again without proving change in consensus or it will be considered vandalism. Thank you. --[[User:MrStalker|<b><font color="black">Mr</font><font color="darkred">Stalker</font></b>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:MrStalker|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</sup> 18:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)el]] ([[User talk:Caissa&#39;s DeathAngel|talk]]) 20:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
:::I consider your edits unconstrutive and have reverted them. Consensus seem to support my opinion. Please to not revert this again without proving change in consensus or it will be considered vandalism. Thank you. --[[User:MrStalker|<b><font color="black">Mr</font><font color="darkred">Stalker</font></b>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:MrStalker|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</sup> 18:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)el]] ([[User talk:Caissa&#39;s DeathAngel|talk]]) 20:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

== System Requirements? ==

Where did these new system requirements come from? Any sources? [[Special:Contributions/122.107.221.248|122.107.221.248]] ([[User talk:122.107.221.248|talk]]) 04:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:11, 18 May 2008

Template:SGames

WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Let's make a great Red Alert 3 article!!

As some of the well-known game magazines are going to be featuring Red Alert 3 as their main article along with proofs of screenshots and feature introductions, it seems pretty clear that there will be official announcement of Red Alert 3. Let's make it a great article! Stevefis (talk) 02:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't enough information to justify an own article yet, per WP:N. However, it will be soon. --MrStalker (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The press release should be enough. xenocidic (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, as I said, soon. --MrStalker (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think we hacked it together pretty well. I'm looking forward to working more on this and other C&C articles with you. xenocidic (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise. --MrStalker (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We've got a start from scratch here, it's just been announced so this is the fastest we could possibly get this article together. I say that by the time of release we should pretty much have it at Good Article or better, and within a few weeks of release we can get it to FA status (before then will be a problem due to the speculative nature of it). Let's be sure we get every scrap of encyclopaedic information on this, as well as ensuring that all the usual standard are adhered to at all times right from the get go. Right first time, every time. Peace through power everyone! Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We'll do our best. --MrStalker (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third Faction = Japan?

I heard some reports that the third faction will be Japan. Can anybody please confirm this and then add it to the article? thanks! Stevefis (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:CRYSTAL, not until it's confirmed. For now people will have to draw their own conclusions from the name of the faction. Rising Sun is a fairly common reference to Japan. xenocidic (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if we were to speculate, I would say that Japan dosn't exist in this timeline, and the name of the third faction actually is "The Empire of the Rising Sun". It may be the same as Japan, like Russia and the Soviet Union, but as I said, it's just speculation. --MrStalker (talk) 19:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would a comment that "Rising Sun" typically refers to Japan be appropriate or is that still crystal balling? xenocidic (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's a comment that has nothing to do in a video game article, but I have put a wikilink to Rising Sun, so readers can take it from there. --MrStalker (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. xenocidic (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is confirmed: http://codered3.com/red-alert-3-in-pc-zone/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.236.221 (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

beta = multiplayer ?

call me stupid, but where does it say that in either of those references? p.s. sorry about fixing those [[dolphin]]s and [[tank]]s, i didn't realize it automagically fixed those - i was just looking at the wikitext. xenocidic (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"By ordering Command & Conquer 3: Kane’s Wrath and registering with the Beta Key before September 15th, 2008, you are guaranteed a chance to play the multiplayer Beta before Command & Conquer Red Alert 3 releases." There you go. --MrStalker (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ahhh now I see it. it was below the fold. cheers mate. edit: actually, It wasn't below the fold. I'm just blind. =) xenocidic (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hehe. No problem. --MrStalker (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Klepacki - Exclusive Interview --Ilhanli (talk) 11:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't have time to do it myself, but if someone wants to add this to the article as a reference to the fan desire for the soundtrack to be done by Klepacki that would be great - I think the desire for his involvement, given his past work on the series, warrants a mention now that we have a good quality reference. Anyone agree?Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 01:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok I've gone and added this. Not the most reliable of sources, but there's no denying the fans want Klepacki so until a better one turns up this will do.Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 11:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Units?

Should we add in the units that have been leaked so far?--64.79.177.254 (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not without reliable sources. --MrStalker (talk) 12:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are units that we know for a fact that are in the game though, ie: the peacekeeper, apoc tank, kirov etc.JackorKnave (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PC Zone April 08 - lots of new info

Any assistance in adding some of the new information contained in this magazine would be great - we have confirmation about several new and returning units, secondary ability details, etc.Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 11:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unwarranted Edits

For future reference, could we please not have fanboy edits who are concerned that "Ohh why did you list PlayStation 3 last, I think it's a conspiracy." That doesn't warrant an entry edit, and you know all too well it's sparking a fire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrel (talkcontribs) 15:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

eh, yea, that particular editor is on a PS3fanboy rampage. imo it should be based on the order that the press release states, in this case it was PC, X360, PS3. xenocidic (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Xeno and Wrel, please don't make unfounded person attacks. It's common knowledge P is before X in the alphabet, which is why I changed it. Hope that clears this up. Also, there are no limitations on what constitutes and edit, Wrel. Thanks! Fin© 16:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I consider your edits unconstrutive and have reverted them. Consensus seem to support my opinion. Please to not revert this again without proving change in consensus or it will be considered vandalism. Thank you. --MrStalker (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)el]] (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

System Requirements?

Where did these new system requirements come from? Any sources? 122.107.221.248 (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]