User talk:Zippycup: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:25, 18 May 2008

This user is a recent changes patroller with Twinkle!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recen

t edits, such as the one you made to Botswana national football team, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcomin

This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.

g committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about

Since you are not an administrator, isn't it odd that you have a userbox on your userpage that says you are?? Just wondering.... Prashanthns (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rnb (talk) 21:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)-----[reply]

If you are intending to improve the encyclopedia, you should try to put the tags in the right place and use the correct dates on them. Thanks! Rnb (talk) 21:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad that manual of style helped you. Prashanthns (talk) 12:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Felixstowe F.2,: No. I dont think that is true. The msg indicates that you undertake [[WP:ADMIN|Administr

This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.

ative functions]] with Twinkle, which is not true, because you dont. Anyway, it was just my suggestion. You are free to do as you please. Prashanthns (talk) 19:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning,

or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. ------- Please

see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking-----

Hi Prashanthns! I got the tag from the twinke main page! I think i refers to doing admin related functions, not actually being an admin. Cheers! . Thank you. Prashanthns (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied to your question here. Thank you. Prashanthns (talk) 21:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.

Ok i will reassess constraints of article. Redirecting Is ODD. Thank you!

admin?

Hi Prashanthns! I got the tag from the twinke main page! I think i refers to doing admin related functions, not actually being an admin. Cheers!

==

This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.

==

This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.

Hello

Just a few things. Firstly, I wanted to inform you that you may be misrespresenting another editor by adding a barnstar in their name on a blocked user's page. This may be a violation of userspace as well as misrepresenting somebody else. Secondly, you are creating multiple redirects from your user talk page and have been reverted once. You have persisted in this. Thirdly, not being an admin, you are misrepresenting yourself as performing admin tasks. Do give a thought to these actions. Prashanthns (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not pose as me by adding a barnstar signed with my signature nor pretend to be an administrator. Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1) Apops on that, i was aiming to gen the temp and i thought i changed the name of the giver. I didn't that was an error on my part. I know the banned user and i also know that they feel unappreciated on wikipedia, they want to contribute and are not sure how. I think a barnstar even if it perhaps may appear undeserved would really changed this users view on wiki. In the name of wikilove and assuming good faith. Once again i apologise for not changing the name of the awarder, that was completely my fault and i apologise to all parties concerned.

2) The redirects were just testing on my part so see how such things work and how the history of the redirect pages reflect this. I felt in inappropriate to perform such tests in the sandbox as they go beyond formatting issues, furthermore i could not find any conclusive material describing how it works. I figured (and still do figure) that my talk page is the best place to trial such test, i don't see how it breaches any wiki policy or has a negative impact on any user, article or the service in general. If know contrary to this, and can source your claims i will happily stop using my talk page to experiment with. If you can't then i would request that you stop reverting my edits. The above comment is not meant to reflect a definitive opinion, as i genuinely do not know if such policy does exist, however i have to the best of my abilities searched for such a policy and found zilch.

3) We have already discussed your third point, you replied by saying "it was just my suggestion. You are free to do as you please." I fail to see why you return to this point?

Cheers, and much wikilove.

Zippycup (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed my twinkle tag for the sake of agreement, i don't think it is worth falling out over. Once again much wikilove.

Zippycup (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTH are you doing?

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
What the heck are you trying to accomplish? I came this close to reporting you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I could probably have been more civil there, but I was not defending myself, I was asking you to defend yourself. The burden of proof lies on the plaintiff; you cannot make blanket accusations on Wikipedia and then provide no evidence to back them up. Seriously, let's get this in the open: Which accounts are my sockpuppets? I don't care whether the authorities see your evidence or not. You say I have sockpuppets. I say I don't. Again, the burden of proof lies on the plaintiff. Please provide valid evidence to support your accusations of me and User:R'n'B. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...and User:Ioeth here. Prashanthns (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(continue)...who's an admin, by the way. Prashanthns (talk) 20:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is included on his 1-6 links above Prashanthns. I have nothing to hide, unlike some. Myself and some others are just having an indepth look into the murky waters of the wikiunderworld. Apparently some bottomfeeding sharks don’t like to be disturbed from their prey. I am aware of the status of Ioeth. I don't see how it changes anything to be honest. I want to make a difference on wiki, and going by the wikilove policies I wish to help some of the more devious carnivores to help themselves. If that means being bitten by those with higher powers then so be it, i am prepared to sacrifice for the good of the community, as are others. Someone has to fight in the front line.

Zippycup (talk) 20:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any actual evidence of all this 'mysterious' sockpupetry in the 'wikiunderworld' or do we only get zoology lessons? Zippycup, quit playing these games. This might actually become quite serious for you. People dont take accusations of sockpuppetry lightly. Prashanthns (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i have plenty of evidence, i am however giving all the accused sometime to think about it. I don't want them to get the sword for their hidden motives if there is any other way. If worst comes to worst however i may have to present my evidence. If such a situation is unavoidable i will regretfully but strongly present dossiers on the accused to a panel. I don’t want to but I will if needed. I think you will find the accused rather reluctant, when push comes to shove to go through with such preceding however. As for you Prashanthns I don’t know where you are in the game, I haven’t had time to delve yet. I will do though, myself or one of my brethren. We will purge wiki of the corruption that blights it. It may not be tomorrow, or a month or even a year but I promise you we will. For the good of the community it must be done.

Cheers and lots of wikilove. Zippycup (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

This is notify you of a report I have filed on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents which concerns your actions. The relevant report may be found at #User:Zippycup. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Point recieved. I wish it had not come to this, i will do as i must however for the good of all.

Revision as of 20:20, 18 May 2008 edit J.delanoy (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 310,263 edits →‎WP:ANI: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:25, 18 May 2008 edit undo Zippycup (talk \| contribs) 69 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 77:		Line 77:

	This is notify you of a report I have filed on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] which concerns your actions. The relevant report may be found at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Zippycup\|#User:Zippycup]]. [[User:J.delanoy\|<font color="#ffe800">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy\|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy\|<sub><font color="blue">adds</font></sub>]] 20:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)		This is notify you of a report I have filed on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] which concerns your actions. The relevant report may be found at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Zippycup\|#User:Zippycup]]. [[User:J.delanoy\|<font color="#ffe800">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy\|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy\|<sub><font color="blue">adds</font></sub>]] 20:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
			:Point recieved. I wish it had not come to this, i will do as i must however for the good of all.