Talk:Oshtur: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
As this information is not commonly shown, and not easily verifyable, I suggest the addition of some sources. Thank you very much, |
As this information is not commonly shown, and not easily verifyable, I suggest the addition of some sources. Thank you very much, |
||
--[[Special:Contributions/213.0.43.166|213.0.43.166]] ([[User talk:213.0.43.166|talk]]) 12:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
--[[Special:Contributions/213.0.43.166|213.0.43.166]] ([[User talk:213.0.43.166|talk]]) 12:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
Suggestion noted [[Special:Contributions/74.220.74.40|74.220.74.40]] ([[User talk:74.220.74.40|talk]]) 21:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:43, 25 May 2008
![]() | Comics: Marvel Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Mystic Arcana
The Mystic Arcana series deals alot about Oshtur. I would consider it to be the best text about her. 74.220.74.40 (talk) 03:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Sourcing
Although this is a minor character (if she is a character at all), the information provided in this page is so alien to me that I cannot but ask for sources. We might even have a case of fanon.
- Notable aliases: I haven't ever heard some of them ("Bird Goddess"?), and I frankly doubt that "Omniopotent" is even a real word ever used to refer to Oshtur.
- Oshtur as an Elder Goddess born from the Demiurge, and surviving the Demogorge - other sources suggest that Gaea was the only Elder Gods who survived without becaming a demon.
- Oshtur and Hoggoth meeting and being "companions" - the first time I've seen they are more than "business partners"
- Oshtur giving birth to Agamotto - !?!? Agamotto's entry says nothing about this.
- Osthur being responsible for creating the Book of the Vishanti - Its entry suggests that the three Vishanti are responsible, and only behind the scenes; the Book was probably written by white wizards who dabbed on the Vishanti's power.
As this information is not commonly shown, and not easily verifyable, I suggest the addition of some sources. Thank you very much, --213.0.43.166 (talk) 12:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion noted 74.220.74.40 (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)