User talk:Briellie: Difference between revisions
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
This is completely incorrect, and the statement should be replaced, and any "warning" removed. SORBS *has* blocked entire /16 blocks, incorrectly blocked vast spaces of New Zealand IP space, and listed several /20 blocks. It is completely false to say that this is based on "opinion and personal feeling." It is a KNOWN FACT. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.210.225.171|67.210.225.171]] ([[User talk:67.210.225.171|talk]]) 02:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This is completely incorrect, and the statement should be replaced, and any "warning" removed. SORBS *has* blocked entire /16 blocks, incorrectly blocked vast spaces of New Zealand IP space, and listed several /20 blocks. It is completely false to say that this is based on "opinion and personal feeling." It is a KNOWN FACT. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.210.225.171|67.210.225.171]] ([[User talk:67.210.225.171|talk]]) 02:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::There is no reason for that comment to even be there, other then a spite or jab at Mat. I might take you more seriously if you weren't anonymous. *hint hint*. Regardless, I am not the first person to remove that type of comment. [[User:Bruns|Brielle]] ([[User talk:Bruns#top|talk]]) 04:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
::There is no reason for that comment to even be there, other then a spite or jab at Mat. I might take you more seriously if you weren't anonymous. *hint hint*. Regardless, I am not the first person to remove that type of comment. [[User:Bruns|Brielle]] ([[User talk:Bruns#top|talk]]) 04:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
You don't need to take me seriously at all. A simple Google search will verify the claims and prove them. So, you're removing things because you think that they're 'opinion and personal feeling.' I have absolutely no reason to take *you* seriously now either, and even less desire to wage a war with Wikipedia revisionists. Cheers! (And the Vandalism Warning will be removed permanently.) |
Revision as of 15:39, 28 May 2008
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/Wikipedia-logo.png/50px-Wikipedia-logo.png)
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
- And remember:
- Be Bold!,
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.,
- Learn from others,
- Play nicely with others, and
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
- P.S. I'm happy to help new users. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Happy Wiki-ing!
- СПУТНИКССС Р 03:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Don't worry about the vandal
Hey there. I just wanted to note that I'm trying to get admins to track down the repeat vandal who's been hitting a number of articles regarding spamfighters. I suspect the same person is behind the recent spate of vandalism, blanking, or libel at Brian J. Bruns, Steve Linford, SPEWS, and so on. I've put in a checkuser request to find out just how much of the recent harassment and vandalism are the same crook.
You don't know me, but I used to be a semi-regular NANAE participant, and I have a great deal of appreciation for the amount of work that people like you and Stiff Linefeed put into keeping the world's email system usable. --FOo 04:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia's LGBT Community
![]() Hi, Briellie!
You may not know that Wikipedia has both an LGBT Notice Board and an LGBT Studies WikiProject. If you haven't yet done so, take a look at both of them. They sorely need attention and participation! Some things on the "To-Do List" that merit particular attention include:
Please feel free to participate in any or all of these activities! And if you feel like it, add yourself to either the Noticeboard Members or the WikiProject Participants - or both! | |||
Glad you're a part of Wikipedia - and Thanks! | This invitation posted here by SatyrTN -- talk Please remove it if you so desire. |
WikiProject LGBT studies
Hello! I noticed that your userpage mentions that you are interested in LGBT issues. Would you be interested in joining WikiProject LGBT studies? The WikiProject's been a bit inactive recently and some of us are trying to get it going again. We'd love to have you on board! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I think this may interest you. Kind regards, Orsini 05:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
FYI
This may be of interest. WP:RSN#The_Abusive_Hosts_Blocking_List Orsini 07:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, thanks, interesting indeed. I need to figure out a worthwhile response I can make... Bri 18:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
Hello, hope this finds you well. I noticed that The4325 left you a barnstar for "being Homosexual." (showing a complete lack of understanding of the difference between gender identity and sexuality, which is unfortunately all too typical) He has since been blocked for adding defamatory content to Talk:Homosexuality. Just thought you should know, and you are obviously free to remove the barnstar if you so desire. Have a wonderful holiday season... l'Aquatique talk 02:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Help?
You posted some warning for a user at "67.210.225.171" - can you please cite evidence of any vandalism? The IP belongs to a shared server and we need to track down the offending user. Vague 'warnings' aren't really helpful. :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.210.225.171 (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- The edit is here[1]. The information added was not NPOV, and was based upon opinion and personal feeling. Brielle (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
This is completely incorrect, and the statement should be replaced, and any "warning" removed. SORBS *has* blocked entire /16 blocks, incorrectly blocked vast spaces of New Zealand IP space, and listed several /20 blocks. It is completely false to say that this is based on "opinion and personal feeling." It is a KNOWN FACT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.210.225.171 (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is no reason for that comment to even be there, other then a spite or jab at Mat. I might take you more seriously if you weren't anonymous. *hint hint*. Regardless, I am not the first person to remove that type of comment. Brielle (talk) 04:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
You don't need to take me seriously at all. A simple Google search will verify the claims and prove them. So, you're removing things because you think that they're 'opinion and personal feeling.' I have absolutely no reason to take *you* seriously now either, and even less desire to wage a war with Wikipedia revisionists. Cheers! (And the Vandalism Warning will be removed permanently.)