Talk:Audio headset: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:10, 28 May 2008

Professional sound production Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Stagecraft (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft articles

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Audio headset article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rewrite

This doesn't read like an encyclopedia article, it doesn't provide any links to veify any of its claims, its references are more like spam than references, and it's totally unwikified. It might be best just to start over. Corvus cornix_talk 18:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article does mention Accutone an awful lot. I just removed a couple links that seemed spammy. It probably would be best to nominate this article for deletion or something. It mentions Accutone and Accutone products way too much to be a healthy, neutral article. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 04:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second the suggestion to delete this article. Please get rid of it. So much of the article is just plain wrong. At the very least, the multitude of incorrect statements need to be dealt with (erased), or this article is going to only spread misinformation. 67.82.74.194 (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 This doesn't read like an encyclopedia article, it doesn't provide any links to veify any of its claims, its references are more like spam than references, and it's totally unwikified.  It might be best just to start over.  <font face="Arial">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Dark Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 18:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 : The article does mention [[Accutone]] an awful lot. I just removed a couple links that seemed spammy. It probably would be best to nominate this article for deletion or something. It mentions Accutone and Accutone products way too much to be a healthy, neutral article. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">[[User:Voyagerfan5761|Tuvok]][<sup>[[User talk:Voyagerfan5761|T]][[Special:Emailuser/Voyagerfan5761|@]][[User talk:Voyagerfan5761|lk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Voyagerfan5761|Improve]]</sub>]</span> 04:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
+: I second the suggestion to delete this article. Please get rid of it. So much of the article is just plain wrong. At the very least, the multitude of incorrect statements need to be dealt with (erased), or this article is going to only spread misinformation. [[Special:Contributions/67.82.74.194|67.82.74.194]] ([[User talk:67.82.74.194|talk]]) 23:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)