User talk:65.173.105.197

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tornadoes of 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Creamy!^Talk 01:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The article is a CURRENT EVENT article. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 02:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Your last IP address was blocked earlier today because of your nonconstructive edits. I'm not reporting this IP straight away for evasion because I don't think you jumped addresses intentionally; however, any further inappropriate editing whatsoever will result in blocks of escalating length. — Lomn 04:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I had someone on here who thought of himself as a comic, another Chris Rock. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Hope this clears things up. I'm a nice guy at heart. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Att. Admin.(s)

Found linkage in the Men In Black article that states that these creatures ARE aliens. See entry, taken from ONE of these links: www.maar.us, Re.: Men In Black. Linkage was placed long ago. Thanks for the attention, consideration. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

See on that website, "Species, click on it, you'll find the entry on the Men In Black there. Again, Thanks. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Also note that there are other links on the article mentioning the same thing. Again, thanks for the attention. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 06:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

As stated, I had a idiot editing on my terminal, so I read the guy " the Riot Act". Any further instructions? 65.173.105.197 (talk) 06:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC) :0

I'm trying to fit in here.65.173.105.197 (talk) 06:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC) :(

See our policies about adding verifiable information from reliable sources and stop adding garbage in the meantime. Just because some crackpot can register a domain and slap up a web page saying "that guy's an alien!" doesn't make it worth adding to Wikipedia. — Lomn 16:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I'd remove it, but a bot would shout "Vandalism!". I DID NOT add those links. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 19:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC) :0

Can I see ALL of those Bots? 65.173.105.197 (talk) 19:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC) :)

1/2 of the vandal warnings came from a FALSE vandalism report on the Fouke article. Some idiot claimed that a cult leader was a BIGFOOT, so when I cleaned out the shit, a bot claimed that I had vandalized it, when I was cleaning it out of said article. 1/2 of the vandal warnings came from a idiot that was om MY terminal. I am NOT contesting ANYTHING, incl. a block at all. I tossed the idiot off of it when I found out what was going on here. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Now that is cleared up, can I get someone over here to explain how these "bots" work, so that IF one malfunctions again, I could have it reprogrammed? 65.173.105.197 (talk) 18:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Those edits were reverted because you inserted a link to youtube (discouraged on Wikipedia, as we cannot verify the copyright status of youtube content) and deleted the references section along with otherwise acceptable edits. I have not found any instance of a bot reverting your removal of the "cult leader is bigfoot" thing, and I concur with your removal. — Lomn 00:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I did NOT insert any youtube links at all, but did remove the cult crap in the Fouke article. Thanks for the help. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Debunk

We've discussed this before. "Ridicule" is not synonymous with "debunk". It appears as a part of the definition, yes, but no more than that. Continued insertions of "debunk means ridicule!" and the like will be treated as vandalism and may result in further blocks. — Lomn 21:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Batfish

Regarding your weird fish link, it's a batfish. We have a limited set of articles that match the fish generally. There's absolutely no reason for paranormal/cryptozoological to care about this. That's the problem with using a generally unreliable source (which I'd classify rense.com as) to try to make content decisions. That page, for example, says "Specialists still have not classified it" -- great scare words for "creepy alien fish!". Problem is, it's utter bilge and a complete misrepresentation of the original source, which says a particular specialist (who? specialist in what? Are we talking a marine life PhD or a fish enthusiast?) hasn't classified it, which is meaningless due to the questions I've laid out. — Lomn 02:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

That is why I come to people like you Lomn. This thing was caught just off of Cuba. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 05:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)