Talk:Obstruent: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Framed0000 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Framed0000 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Agreed. I think the t in cat or the p in sap could be considered obstruents, at least pronounced the way most American-English speakers would pronounce it. [[User:Framed0000|Framed0000]] ([[User talk:Framed0000|talk]]) 20:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
:: Agreed. I think the t in cat or the p in sap could be considered obstruents, at least pronounced the way most American-English speakers would pronounce it. [[User:Framed0000|Framed0000]] ([[User talk:Framed0000|talk]]) 20:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
::I should be more specific--the t in cat and the p in sap might be considered obstruents when speakers are speaking quickly. [[User:Framed0000|Framed0000]] ([[User talk:Framed0000|talk]]) 19:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:46, 23 June 2008
Linguistics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
An example would be helpful. --Delirium 09:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure would. Bubba73 (talk), 06:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think the t in cat or the p in sap could be considered obstruents, at least pronounced the way most American-English speakers would pronounce it. Framed0000 (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I should be more specific--the t in cat and the p in sap might be considered obstruents when speakers are speaking quickly. Framed0000 (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)