User talk:122.104.137.25

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, to Dan Brown it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.Modernist (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues on Dan Brown, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Modernist (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Evolution as theory and fact. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Gail (talk) 12:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Evolution as theory and fact. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 12:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for inserting false or misleading information into articles.. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

122.104.137.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made factual edits on wikipedia

Decline reason:

Your edits were disruptive. In future, I suggest you establish consensus on the talk page, before making controversial changes. — PhilKnight (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

122.104.137.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I started a discussion, but no one responded; therefore unable to reach a consensus

Decline reason:

Waiting seven minutes after your sole comment, and then re-inserting the language that kept getting removed, is hardly attempting to reach consensus. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 15:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

122.104.137.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I never re-inserted the same edits, if you look at the history every edit pertains to something different. Several people reverted any edit I made, yet not a single one answered the discussion page?

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I never re-inserted the same edits, if you look at the history every edit pertains to something different. Several people reverted any edit I made, yet not a single one answered the discussion page? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I never re-inserted the same edits, if you look at the history every edit pertains to something different. Several people reverted any edit I made, yet not a single one answered the discussion page? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I never re-inserted the same edits, if you look at the history every edit pertains to something different. Several people reverted any edit I made, yet not a single one answered the discussion page? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}