Compressed-air car: Difference between revisions
Greglocock (talk | contribs) revert pov edits |
Mercury888 (talk | contribs) Gregololock what is your problem? Do you work for the automobile or fuel industry? Stop being a tool mate. |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
*When the air is expanded in the engine, it will cool down via adiabatic cooling and lose pressure thus its ability to do work at colder temperatures. It is difficult to maintain or restore the air temperature by simply using a heat exchanger with ambient heat at the high flow rates used in a vehicle, thus the ideal isothermic energy capacity of the tank will not be realised. Cold temperatures will also encourage the engine to ice up. |
*When the air is expanded in the engine, it will cool down via adiabatic cooling and lose pressure thus its ability to do work at colder temperatures. It is difficult to maintain or restore the air temperature by simply using a heat exchanger with ambient heat at the high flow rates used in a vehicle, thus the ideal isothermic energy capacity of the tank will not be realised. Cold temperatures will also encourage the engine to ice up. |
||
*Compressed air vehicles likely will be less robust than typical vehicles of today. Which poses a danger to users of compressed air vehicles sharing the road with larger, heavier and more rigid vehicles. |
|||
*Using energy to compress air is less efficient than charging a battery with that same energy<ref>[[Hydrogen economy]] Battery charging from grid is 93% efficient</ref><ref>JB Heywood "Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals" pp 255-273 shows no compressor with an efficiency >80%</ref> - compressed-air car's overall efficiency is approximately one third of a comparable electric car.<ref>http://www.efcf.com/reports/E18.pdf Page 8 Figure 5</ref><ref>http://www.csiro.au/resources/pf11g.html#design Electric motors are up to 98.4% efficient</ref><ref>http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/lsr/scs_phase1/figures/figab18.jpg Efficiency of turbines 95%)</ref><!--need a piston expander efficincy reference--> |
|||
*The major problem of all compressed air or liquified air cars is the lack of torque provided by the compressed gas and the high cost to compress the gas. This was shown to be the case starting in 1903 with the Liquified Air Company car of London England <ref>[http://www.didik.com/ev_hist.htm] Photograph from 1903 of the Liquid Air Car</ref> |
*The major problem of all compressed air or liquified air cars is the lack of torque provided by the compressed gas and the high cost to compress the gas. This was shown to be the case starting in 1903 with the Liquified Air Company car of London England <ref>[http://www.didik.com/ev_hist.htm] Photograph from 1903 of the Liquid Air Car</ref> |
||
*Long refill time when refilled using a home or low-end system (circa 4 hours). However, at a commercial station refilling would take only 3 minutes.<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6138972/ Car runs on compressed air, but will it sell? - Green Machines - MSNBC.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> But for that, fueling stations would have to invest in new dispensers. |
*Long refill time when refilled using a home or low-end system (circa 4 hours). However, at a commercial station refilling would take only 3 minutes.<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6138972/ Car runs on compressed air, but will it sell? - Green Machines - MSNBC.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> But for that, fueling stations would have to invest in new low-cost dispensers. |
||
*Governments would either lose tax income or have to adapt their taxation strategies. |
*Governments would either lose tax income or have to adapt their taxation strategies. |
||
Revision as of 04:03, 4 July 2008
![]() | This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/18/Catvertroquette.jpg/200px-Catvertroquette.jpg)
A Compressed air car is an alternative fuel car that uses a motor powered by compressed air. This can also be combined (as in a hybrid electric vehicle) with gasoline/diesel/ethanol or electric plant and regenerative braking.
Several companies are investigating and producing prototypes and other ones, including Tata Motors. "The first cars are promoted as being available on the market in summer 2008 (promotions which were preceded by similar promotions in earlier years)"[1]
Overview
The compressed air car has been mentioned in Popular Mechanics[2] and the Yahoo Green blog[3] as being the true car of tomorrow, with a range comparable to an electric vehicle or fuel-cell car. It claims to offer zero emissions at the tailpipe without batteries or hydrogen fuel.
History
Technology
Engines
You will be able to buy the vehicle with the engine, or buy an engine to be installed in a vehicle[citation needed].
Compressed air cars are powered by engines, fueled by compressed air, which is stored in a tank under high pressure such as 30 MPa (4500 psi or 300 bar), following ISO 11439.[4] The storage tank is likely to be made of carbon-fiber in order to reduce its weight while achieving the necessary strength. Instead of mixing fuel with air and burning it to drive pistons with hot expanding gases; compressed air cars use the expansion of compressed air to drive their pistons.
The idea is not new. It has been used since 1930s in cars and in Formula 1 as a start-up engine, as well as for the propulsion of torpedoes. While gasoline or diesel fuel tanks have the same amount of energy per litre of fuel from the first to the last litre, compressed air motors rely on the pressure within the tank, which decreases as air is drawn off. Because the air flows through a pressure regulator before going to the engine, no reduction in power would be noticed until the tank was nearly exhausted. This is the case for electric vehicles, too. This process of pressure regulation will reduce the energy available due to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Storage Tanks
Compressed air is a heavy way of storing fuel, 300l air at 30 MPa (300 Bar) about 16 kWh [5] (the equivalent of 1.7 liters [6](0.44 gallons) of gasoline, assuming a 100% efficiency of the engine). During rupture testing, the tank cracks, but does not break up, producing no splinters or fragments.
All four major manufacturers that are developing air cars have designed safety features into their containers, in contrast to hydrogen's issues of damage and danger involved in high-impact crashes. Air, on its own, is non-flammable. Though no company has yet demonstrated the effectiveness of an imploding engine (ZAP) vs. a quick release (MDI) standard, and other safety designs, it is expected that large-scale production may lead specific governments to set their own standards. It was reported on Discovery's Beyond Tomorrow that on its own, carbon-fiber is brittle and splits, but creates no shrapnel.
Emission output
Compressed air cars are emission-free at the 'tailpipe', but the energy, usually electric, required to recharge the compressed air tanks may come from the combustion of fossil fuels. Unless all of the energy comes from non-fossil sources, like nuclear power, biomass, wind power, solar power, or hydroelectricity, compressed air cars will still cause net emissions of greenhouse gas, proportional to the ratio of energy produced via fossil fuels. However, emissions would be relocated from city streets to remote smokestacks. CO2 can potentially be sequestered from large plants but not from individual vehicles. Of course a solar and/or wind recharging system can be installed in one's home, in the car or power plants, thereby eliminating the dependence on the consumption of nuclear-fossil electricity. When energy from biomass is used as the energy source with CO2 removal, neutral emissions of CO2 would -- in theory -- be the result. The same is true of traditional IC vehicles run on biofuels.
An air motor also releases air cleaner than its intake, due to the presence of an air filter to keep contaminants out of the mechanism. Consequently, this can be viewed as air purification instead of air pollution.
Advantages
The principal advantages of an air powered vehicle are:[7]
- Much like electrical vehicles, air powered vehicles would ultimately be powered through the electrical grid. That makes it easier to focus on reducing pollution from one source, as opposed to the millions of vehicles on the road.
- Compressed air engine reduces the cost of vehicle production by about 20%, because there is no need to build a cooling system, spark plugs or silencers.
- Most compressed air engines do not need a transmission, just a flow control.
- Transportation of the fuel would not be required due to drawing power off the electrical grid. This presents significant cost benefits. Pollution created during fuel transportation would be eliminated.
- Very low self-discharge rate (most batteries will deplete their charge without external load at a rate determined by the chemistry, design, and size, while compressed gas storage will have an extremely low leakage rate)
- Long storage lifetime device (electric vehicle batteries have a limited useful number of cycles, and sometimes a limited calendar lifetime, irrespective of use). This means that batteries in operation are much more expensive than compressed air storage, and are more polluting because a lot more pollutant material needs to be used (typical car batteries are made from sulfuric acids and lead).
- Lower initial cost than battery electric vehicles when mass produced. One estimate is €3,000 less.
- Compressed air not subject to fuel tax at present (one taxing method would apply also to electric cars by taxing the electricity used for compression or charging).
- Expansion of the compressed air reduces its temperature and heat from the passenger compartment may be cooled using a heat exchanger, providing both relief from hot weather by air conditioning and increased efficiency.
- Zero pollutant emissions from the vehicle itself.
- Compressed air is not a fire hazard, only a rapid depressurization hazard (this can be mitigated by using carbon fiber tanks).
- Air turbine technology, closely related to steam turbine technology, is a practice over 50 years old. It is simple to achieve with low tech materials. This would mean that developing countries, and rapidly growing countries like China and India, could easily implement a less polluting means of personal transportation than an internal combustion engine automobile.
- Possibility to refill air tank at home (using domestic power socket).[8]
- Lighter vehicles would mean less abuse on roads. Resulting in longer lasting roads.
- The price of fueling air powered vehicles will be significantly cheaper than current fuels.
Disadvantages
Having solved most of the high pressure storage and handling problems, the main remaining disadvantages are related to the thermodynamics.[9]
- When the air is expanded in the engine, it will cool down via adiabatic cooling and lose pressure thus its ability to do work at colder temperatures. It is difficult to maintain or restore the air temperature by simply using a heat exchanger with ambient heat at the high flow rates used in a vehicle, thus the ideal isothermic energy capacity of the tank will not be realised. Cold temperatures will also encourage the engine to ice up.
- The major problem of all compressed air or liquified air cars is the lack of torque provided by the compressed gas and the high cost to compress the gas. This was shown to be the case starting in 1903 with the Liquified Air Company car of London England [10]
- Long refill time when refilled using a home or low-end system (circa 4 hours). However, at a commercial station refilling would take only 3 minutes.[11] But for that, fueling stations would have to invest in new low-cost dispensers.
- Governments would either lose tax income or have to adapt their taxation strategies.
Models
![]() | This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (February 2008) |
Various companies are investing in the research, development and deployment of Compressed air cars. Overoptimistic reports of impending production date back to at least May 1999. For instance, the MDI Air Car made its public debut in South Africa in 2002,[12] and was predicted to be in production "within six months" in January 2004.[13] Most of the cars under development also rely on using similar technology to Low-energy vehicles in order to increase the range and performance of their cars.
The AirCar
Air Car Factories SA[3] is proposing to develop and build a compressed air engine.
Energine
The Energine Corporation was a South Korean company that claimed to deliver fully-assembled cars running on a hybrid compressed air and electric engine. These cars are more precisely named pneumatic-hybrid electric vehicles.[14]. Engineers from this company made, starting from a Daewoo Matiz, a prototype of a hybrid electric/compressed-air engine (Pne-PHEV, pneumatic plug-in hybrid electric vehicle[citation needed]). The compressed-air engine is used to activate an alternator, which extends the autonomous operating capacity of the car.
The CEO is the first compressed air car promoter to be arrested for fraud.[15]
A similar (but only for braking energy recovery) concept using a pneumatic accumulator in a largely hydraulic system has been developed by U.S. government research laboratories and industry, and is now being introduced for certain heavy vehicle applications such as refuse trucks.[16]
EngineAir
EngineAir, an Australian company, is developing a rotary engine powered by compressed air.[17][18]
K'Airmobiles
K'Airmobiles has presented two running prototypes of VPA (Vehicles with Pneumatic Assistance). Their leaders now seek to gain the means of developing several projects of urban or leisure VPP (Vehicles with Pneumatic Propulsion). K'Airmobiles propose a different technology with their VPP , which may allow a reasonable range, generally with compressed air tanks of about 50L-100L/3000 psi capacity only.
These ecological vehicles use the technology of the compressed-air engine K'Air, developed in France by a small group of researchers, which thus proposes a range of projects around an idea: that of the urban or leisure compressed-air vehicles.
K'Airmobiles is the name given to a set of projects relating to "VPA" (Vehicles with Pneumatic Assistance) and "VPP" (Vehicles with Pneumatic Propulsion), aiming to escape the constraints from thermodynamics. To do so, these models are conceived like ultra light vehicles (limited to 250 kg max.), and their consumption of compressed air was calculated to remain lower than 120 L/min., although developing a dynamic push able to reach 4kN.
Two VPA prototypes are operational today, the "K'AirBike" and the K'AirKart. Two new VPP prototypes, the one-seater "K'AirTrike" and the three-seater "K'AirMobile Max" are intended for public presentation in October and November 2007 respectively.
The technical concept of the K'Air pneumatic engines returns to direct conversion of what makes the fundamental characteristic of compressed air, namely:
- the pushing force of compressed air is exclusively exploited for conversion into kinetic energy of translation,
- itself is simultaneously converted into induced power of rotation of the axis and
- thus gives to the engine a particularly imposing torque while needing only a very low “fuel” consumption.
To simplify, one can compare the principle to that of the rotary jacks:
- the energy of the fluid (compressed air) is directly transformed into rotational movement;
- the double-acting jacks involve a pinion-toothed rack system;
- the cyclic angle of rotation can vary between 90 and 360°;
- it supports hydraulic supercharging systems.
MDI and Tata Motors
MDI proposes a range of vehicles developed on an identical concept, made up of MiniCATs and CityCATs.
The MDI MiniCat has a range of up to 1000 miles when fitted with an internal combustion engine, but that drops to 30 miles when used in ZEV mode at low speeds in cities. OneCAT, priced in a range ($5,100 to $7,800) within reach of consumers in a developing economy, such as India.[19].
The ultralight bodies of the vehicles would be made of glued-together fiberglass and injected foam, and the aluminum chassis would also be glued, not welded, to simplify manufacturing.[20]
The engine is available in two versions. The Mono Energy air engine is a true air engine. The Dual Energy engines are Internal combustion engines, which use hydrocarbon fuels.[21]
They have licensed 12 factories : 5 in Mexico, 3 in Australia and New Zealand, 1 in South Africa and 3 in France. MDI Andina S.A is going to sell the car in Colombia, Peru, Ecuador and Panama. MDI has entered into an agreement with Tata Motors, to produce air cars in India. Zero Pollution Motors will be the first company to manufacture and sell a car in the U.S. called the "Air Car" using MDI technology. ZPM will begin taking reservations in early 2008 for US deliveries in early 2010.[22]
Psycho-Active
Team Psycho-Active (TPA) has competed in the Automotive X PRIZE.[23] TPA is working to develop the EPOCH: a highly customizable and serviceable pneumatic / multi-fuel hybrid. At its core is the DBRE engine. The DBRE's unique characteristics allow the EPOCH to use most commercially available fuels and/or compressed air.[24]
Quasiturbine
The Quasiturbine is a prototype for a hybrid engine which, according to its originators, could function with an explosive fuel and with compressed air alike.
Hinged Rotor Internal Combustion Engine
Despite its name, this patent (US 6,718,938) describes an engine very similar to the Quasiturbine, and equally applicable to compressed air technology. The main difference is the much simpler method used to transfer rotor power to the central driveshaft.
Tata
As of May 2007 Tata Motors of India planned to launch an MDI air car in 2008.[25]
Electro-Tech Enterprises
Electro-Tech Enterprises is a small company that specializes in electric air vehicles using a new technology discovered by themselves that is currently in the proto-type phase.[dubious – discuss]
See also
References
- ^ http://www.theaircar.com/faq.html
- ^ MDI teaming up with Tata Motors to develop commercial air-powered cars.
- ^ similar article in the Yahoo! Green blog
- ^ Gas cylinders -- High pressure cylinders for the on-board storage of natural gas as a fuel for automotive vehicles
- ^ Google Calculator
- ^ Google Calculator
- ^ What About Compressed Air Cars? : TreeHugger
- ^ Car runs on compressed air, but will it sell? - Green Machines - MSNBC.com
- ^ http://www.efcf.com/reports/ Thermodynamic Analysis of Compressed Air Vehicle Propulsion
- ^ [1] Photograph from 1903 of the Liquid Air Car
- ^ Car runs on compressed air, but will it sell? - Green Machines - MSNBC.com
- ^ Kevin Bonsor (2005-10-25). "How Air-Powered Cars Will Work". HowStuffWorks. Retrieved 2006-05-25.
- ^ Robyn Curnow (2004-01-11). "Gone with the wind". The Sunday Times (UK). Retrieved 2006-05-25.
- ^ http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7028482.html[2]
- ^ Digital Chosunilbo (English Edition) : Daily News in English About Korea
- ^ Bosch Rexroth Named Subcontractor for Hydraulic Hybrid Refuse Truck Field Test, Bos
- ^ http://www.gizmag.com/go/3185/
- ^ www.engineair.com.au
- ^ Technology Review: The Air Car Preps for Market
- ^ Technology Review: The Air Car Preps for Market
- ^ MDI Enterprises S.A
- ^ http://www.zeropollutionmotors.us
- ^ http://www.psycho-active.org/main.html
- ^ http://www.psycho-active.org/epoch.html
- ^ "World's First Air-Powered Car: Zero Emissions by Next Summer". Popular Mechanics. 2007-05-28. Retrieved 2007-05-28.