Jump to content

Talk:George Washington in the American Revolution: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
C-class; adding WikiProject Bibliography template in order to code it as such
Line 25: Line 25:


:It ''is'' in the main article, in the form of a ''summary''. This article is called a "daughter article" (see [[WP:SS]]). (If everything about George Washington were in a single article, it would be far, far too long for most readers.) -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:John Broughton|John Broughton]] </font> [[User talk:John Broughton |(♫♫)]] 13:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
:It ''is'' in the main article, in the form of a ''summary''. This article is called a "daughter article" (see [[WP:SS]]). (If everything about George Washington were in a single article, it would be far, far too long for most readers.) -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:John Broughton|John Broughton]] </font> [[User talk:John Broughton |(♫♫)]] 13:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

== Who is telling the truth? ==

This article and the [[Military career of George Washington]] article say two completely different things. This article states that "Washington's contribution to victory in the American Revolution was not that of a great battlefield tactician; in fact, he lost more battles than he won..." whereas the other article states this as a myth and proves otherwise. I'm not an expert on Washington, so... which one is right?

Revision as of 19:39, 5 July 2008

WikiProject iconBiography C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
Taskforce icon
American Revolutionary War task force

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Needed?

Does this article need to exist? Surely it belongs in the main George Washington article if anywhere. 86.139.146.148 (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the main article, in the form of a summary. This article is called a "daughter article" (see WP:SS). (If everything about George Washington were in a single article, it would be far, far too long for most readers.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 13:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who is telling the truth?

This article and the Military career of George Washington article say two completely different things. This article states that "Washington's contribution to victory in the American Revolution was not that of a great battlefield tactician; in fact, he lost more battles than he won..." whereas the other article states this as a myth and proves otherwise. I'm not an expert on Washington, so... which one is right?