User talk:Coolest Kid 10

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Coolest Kid20 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. MightyHamster (talk) 02:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Please address this issue rather than simply blanking your page. It seems almost certain that you previously edited as User:Coolest Kid 20 and with the various IP addresses listed in the sockpuppetry case. Thanks, Gwernol 13:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Richard Arnold (TV presenter). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 13:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to YouTube. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 13:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

I have indefinitely blocked your User:Coolest kid 20 account and placed a 1 week block on this account for sockpuppetry. You may not use multiple accounts. Once the block lifts, please only use this account. Creation and use of other accounts will result in indefinite blocks on all such accounts, preventing you from further editing on Wikipedia. Gwernol 13:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 13:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chris Tarrant, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kwekubo (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to It Isn't What You Know has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Please don't blank the user page

It is against wikipedia guidelines, and may get you blocked. Nzseries1 (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gok Wan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  17:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I am making you aware of the three revert rule regarding edits to articles. You are in danger of violating this guideline. Please discuss any issues you have regarding the wording of Gok Wan on the relevant talk page. The best, Mark t young (talk) 18:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richard Arnold (TV presenter), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mark t young (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Richard Arnold (TV presenter).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coolest Kid 10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

You are not blocked. Please stop vandalizing this page Gwernol 17:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Coolest Kid 10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

But this is my own User Talk Page. Why do you care if I vandalize. And this isn't supposed to be an unblock request. I'm only sending it as this you could see this message

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=But this is my own User Talk Page. Why do you care if I vandalize. And this isn't supposed to be an unblock request. I'm only sending it as this you could see this message |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=But this is my own User Talk Page. Why do you care if I vandalize. And this isn't supposed to be an unblock request. I'm only sending it as this you could see this message |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=But this is my own User Talk Page. Why do you care if I vandalize. And this isn't supposed to be an unblock request. I'm only sending it as this you could see this message |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}