User talk:Bart Versieck: Difference between revisions
m You are a bore |
|||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
**Okay, but I for my part am still waiting for the editor in question whom I reverted to react. [[User:Bart Versieck|Extremely sexy]] ([[User talk:Bart Versieck#top|talk]]) 23:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC) |
**Okay, but I for my part am still waiting for the editor in question whom I reverted to react. [[User:Bart Versieck|Extremely sexy]] ([[User talk:Bart Versieck#top|talk]]) 23:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
***As far as my two cents are concerned, for the incivility so neatly summed up by xenocidic in his last post in the "Blocked for 24 hours" section, I support a much longer block (as in, the week immediately at the very least). There's absolutely no excuse for that and it's not at all trivial. Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 00:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
***As far as my two cents are concerned, for the incivility so neatly summed up by xenocidic in his last post in the "Blocked for 24 hours" section, I support a much longer block (as in, the week immediately at the very least). There's absolutely no excuse for that and it's not at all trivial. Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 00:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
****I was not incivil, just very angry. [[User:Bart Versieck|Extremely sexy]] ([[User talk:Bart Versieck#top|talk]]) 14:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Editing == |
== Editing == |
Revision as of 14:54, 21 July 2008
Hello! Please, append your message at the end of the page. This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Welcome to Wikipedia!Goeiedag/Hello Bart Versieck, welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some tips:
If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing. WOP NewsletterWikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Newsletter/Archives/1 Bart, try reading some policies. WP:LEAD clearly states "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article." Seeing as how it went through a good article review that noted that the introduction was good, it should remain there. Also, you have already twice broken your promise not to touch other's talk page edits for any reason, and I have brought it up here with another administrator to discuss the appropriate course of action. Cheers, CP 19:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
And yet you didn't ask him about this. Should I tell LHvU or will you? Cheers, CP 19:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for 3 hoursWell, of course I was going to be watching your talkpage. If you needed to have changed the time/date you should have asked the editor concerned to clarify it, or asked someone else to place a comment, such as <small> (original comment placed at XX:XX on YYY and later signed as here.) </small>, under it. Please just sit out this block, BV, so you will remember better what it is that you must not do. Try to ensure that there is no "next time" LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Lucy, you've got some 'splainin' to do. Am I mistaken in thinking that the agreement was that you wouldn't touch anyone else's comments for any reason? Cheers, CP 18:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hoursYou have not answered the concerns of 3 editors above, so I have blocked you from editing while you consider your response. You will note that this block is longer than the previous one, and the next one will be longer still. This cycle of "violation/block" will increase until either you stop editing other contributors comments, or you are blocked permanently from the encyclopedia. Had you responded to the above it is possible that there would have been no block, although I cannot guarantee this would have been the case, but since you responded to subsequent comments on your page I have assumed you are unwilling to reply to the concerns raised. It was on this basis that I decided to reblock you. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Unblock requests
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Bart Versieck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: See above Decline reason: After reading your talk page, it seems like you really don't understand what you did was wrong; besides, your unblock reason isn't very clear nor does it address the problem. — Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Bart Versieck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Well: "LessHeard vanU" should be dealing with this, and he specifically stated that he probably wouldn't have blocked me if I had responded to them, and furthermore he assumed that I was unwilling to answer them since he thought that I had responded to others on my talkpage at that time, which is incorrect, because I wasn't online and the subsequent headings are from weeks ago. Decline reason: Declining unblock to remove you from the category and will leave a message on LHvU's talk page. –xeno (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
EditingBart, there is no need to pipe World War II into the Second World War when "World War II" is the title of the article. It's a complete waste. Furthermore, trying to sneak it back in without explanation after I reverted it is not good faith and certainly not conducive to the spirit of Wikipedia discussion and consensus. Finally, it is extremely misleading and disingenuous to provide an automatic edit summary of "reverting edit blah blah blah", then perform a whole bunch of editing that is completely unrelated within the same edit (unless you also add in the edit summary that you are doing it). Your entire editing behavior, not just your actions on talk pages, are being watched, and shenanigans such as these are not very conducive to promoting your good faith contributions to this encyclopedia after so many warnings. Cheers, CP 19:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Here is the link to the picture as you requested. I contacted Jeff Wheeler about it but I only asked for permission on Wikipedia. I decided not to contact him for free use. If you wish to contact him about the picture be my guest. --Npnunda (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Snooker world rankings 2008/2009Please stop undoing my edits on this article. All i'm doing is adding perfectly sensible internal links to snooker player articles. Thank you. Samasnookerfan (talk) 19:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
|