User talk:BigHairRef

I patrol Wikipedia using Huggle, and previously using VandalProof before it broke. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note: Most Huggle work I do involves patrolling new pages. Because of the IRC feed it is possible to review upwards of 30 pages per minute using this tool and tag up to 15 ppm if a page is obviously going to fail a speedy deletion. Huggle allows me to tag and leave messages whilst looking at other pages, just because of my speed does not mean I just tag pages for the sake of it without reading. If I am wrong then all I can say is sorry but I made a mistake like we all do and hopefully the tag, PROD or XFD will fail. I am not on Wikipedia 24/7. I've I have made a mistake I usually realise my error and revert it. If I haven't after a few minutes feel free to leave a message If I don't revert a bad edit after a few minutes I made feel free to point it out. I usually spot when I've made bad edits so at least give me a minute to revert any tagging if it's clearly wrong. If your article is sub stub, but you're going to improve it, please make sure you tag the article so I know you're not just going to leave it like most of the new pages I come accross. If I see it's not intended to be the finished product then I'll back off.

If you leave a message on my talk page I will leave replies on your talk page

Vandal Count

vn- 4This user talk page has been vandalized 4 times.

Welcome!

Hello, BigHairRef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  bibliomaniac15 Review? 01:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy

Creations of satyajit ray, though not a good title, does not fit into the critria established for WP:CSD A1, No context. the context is clear and obvious. Similarly The Billy Goat Caller though an impossibly bad article, also does not meet that definition. Also For a no construction tag, it is usual to allow 7 days for completion of the article, not 2 hours. I see a number of other people have mad similar complaints about your speedy deletions.

Now, I note you were using Huggle. If you are going to use automated tools, you have a special responsibility to make sure to use them correctly. I would strongly advise you (and for that matter everyone) to stop using it for speedy deletion marking. DGG (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Bradford City GA review

Hi there. Thanks for the review of Bradford City A.F.C. season 2007-08. I was very surprised to see it all passed when I logged on. I'll see if there are any more images possible, though I'm not sure there are. But would you have any other recommendations for pushing towards FAC. Peanut4 (talk) 10:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

VP

Basically VP is dead, and I did communicate with amidaniel about it, but he doesn't appear to have done anything about that. I would strongly recommend WP:HUGGLE as a much better and up to date tool. Prodego ^talk 14:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I offered to do as you suggest a while ago, but amidaniel indicated that he would like to do that himself, so I am reluctant to. And he is still around, but rarely edits. Prodego ^talk 00:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Page move at Cricket clothing

Hi. I noticed this edit and wondered where the discussion regarding it was? --Dweller (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Might have been an idea to drop a line to the creator or the main contributor... oops, that's me twice :-) No worries. The title's not really appropriate, as I don't think it's ever called "cricket clothing" that I know of, but I've kicked off a debate at WT:CRIC to find its best home... it might end up being merged. --Dweller (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

James Nesbitt

I moved your review from the article talk page to Talk:James Nesbitt/GA1 as per Wikipedia:Good article nominations process. I came by to learn how others do it! Hope you don't mind. Edmund Patrick – confer 17:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, BigHairRef. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Untitled F.C. 7 Sockpuppetry case

No, he was editing the page and noticed the message above and attempted to fight the deletion. Or at least that is what i believe. Please consider the page ignore the other person. I begun the page and really believe it is a page the deserves to be there. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mido z05 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

R.K Narayan

Well,I just removed duplicate sections from this article. This is no vandalism. But yes i did not write about it in the reasons field. I will take care next time. Nitinbajaj1 (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)