Jump to content

User talk:Way4743: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Way4743 (talk | contribs)
Way4743 (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:


Iam sorry Iam not a sock and I would like to be more constructive.--[[User:Way4743|Way4743]] ([[User talk:Way4743#top|talk]]) 15:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Iam sorry Iam not a sock and I would like to be more constructive.--[[User:Way4743|Way4743]] ([[User talk:Way4743#top|talk]]) 15:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)




== I'd like to Comment on what I saw on the other Talk pages ==


First of all I would like to be more constructive on here and yes as I said Iam truly sorry for causing vandalism but I just don't know if Iam that comfortable now being on here because I feel like Iam treated to harshly. So I would never tintend to do such a thing like that and Iam truly sorry.--[[User:Way4743|Way4743]] ([[User talk:Way4743#top|talk]]) 15:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

If anyone wants to comment then be my guest--[[User:Way4743|Way4743]] ([[User talk:Way4743#top|talk]]) 15:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:33, 30 July 2008

July 2008

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carly Smithson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tan ǀ 39 14:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Way4743 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'd like to request this account gets unblocked please and Iam very sorry for my actions

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I'd like to request this account gets unblocked please and Iam very sorry for my actions |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I'd like to request this account gets unblocked please and Iam very sorry for my actions |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I'd like to request this account gets unblocked please and Iam very sorry for my actions |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I am considering this, as you were blocked indef on four edits, only one of which was to article namespace, and without any final warning. But first I'd like to read about what sort of legitimate edits you might be interested in making. Daniel Case (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commented on my talk page. Probable sock of user whose talk page he blanked twice, coupled with BLP vandalism. However, if you feel this editor will be constructive, feel free to override the block - I have no vested interest in it. Tan ǀ 39 15:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Iam sorry Iam not a sock and I would like to be more constructive.--Way4743 (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]



I'd like to Comment on what I saw on the other Talk pages

First of all I would like to be more constructive on here and yes as I said Iam truly sorry for causing vandalism but I just don't know if Iam that comfortable now being on here because I feel like Iam treated to harshly. So I would never tintend to do such a thing like that and Iam truly sorry.--Way4743 (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone wants to comment then be my guest--Way4743 (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]