Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Holiday: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:37, 24 August 2008

Tiffany Holiday

Porn actress who does not appear to satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Speedily deleted seven times over the past few years, and it doesn't seem that notability has improved. A previous deletion review can be seen here. The article does not assert notability in my view, but the speedy tag was removed and given the history I think its time for an AfD discussion. Accurizer (talk) 02:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt the earth. An attempts to recreate this article should have to pass a deletion review, this is getting ridiculous. It is bordering on disruptive. Wikipedia is not a place for promotion.--Crossmr (talk) 02:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT. I definitely wouldn't do her. Oh, and WP:PORNBIO. Ya, that too. Ironho lds 03:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Fails WP:N amd WP:BIO. This in spite of such encyclopedic text as "She is known for a big natural breast." One breast? Is the other lesser in size or unnatural in its augmentation? Edison2 (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Indeed, it does not satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Lady Galaxy 06:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - Pass WP:PORNBIO, WP:N and WP:BIO - see talk page, over 100 scenes, 894,000 hit on Google [1], 36,200 on Google Images [2]. Very famous American porn star [3] [4]. --THFFF (talk) 07:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update - Many film she starred are AVN Award Nominees, I've add it to the article. Now you can't say she doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Please reconsider your vote. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.247.170 (talk) 08:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has been nominated 4 times for the AVN Award. The criteria states "Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award" - what does "serious nominee" mean though? Lugnuts (talk) 08:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She hasn't been nominated 4 times for an AVN Award, just the films were. Epbr123 (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep real porn star Qwerty1234 (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO. As for the claims above, notability is not inherited from the films she was in, especially based on cast listings. Also X number of films and Y number of ghits are not reliable criteria for notability, especially in porn. They are too easily inflated. This article is basically an IAFD entry. • Gene93k (talk) 09:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Gene93k. Tabercil (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: She has over 800,000 hits on Google - most of the porn stars who have an article on Wikipedia have less than 800,000 hits. What about the Google Image test? She has over 36,000 images - most of the porn stars who have an article on Wikipedia have less than 36,000 hits on Google Image. Exemple: [5]. You can check it. Tabercil, you know porn, you should know she is notable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by THFFF (talk • contribs) 08:15, August 24, 2008 (UTC)

G-hits is insufficient. If you look at WP:PORNBIO, you'll see right below it the Invalid criteria, which points out that Googlebombing can influence the result and the porn industry is known to use that. Tabercil (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

100+ scenes. According to WP:PORNBIO most of the porn stars on Wikipedia should be deleted :( ... In fact I think that WP:PORNBIO should be deleted - Porn stars are people and they should be judged like any other person. --THFFF (talk) 12:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why other porn stars have not been GoogleBoombed and have less G-Hits. Like Bobbi Starr (Bobbi and Starr are very common names).

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :::G-hits is insufficient. If you look at [[WP:PORNBIO]], you'll see right below it the Invalid criteria, which points out that Googlebombing can influence the result and the porn industry is known to use that. [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] ([[User talk:Tabercil|talk]]) 12:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 ::::100+ scenes. According to [[WP:PORNBIO]] most of the porn stars on Wikipedia should be deleted :( ... In fact I think that [[WP:PORNBIO]] should be deleted - Porn stars are people and they should be judged like any other person. --[[User:THFFF|THFFF]] ([[User talk:THFFF|talk]]) 12:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
+::::Why other porn stars have not been GoogleBoombed and have less G-Hits. Like [[Bobbi Starr]] ([[Bobbi]] and [[Starr]] are very common names).
 *<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]].  </small> <small>-- [[User:Xymmax|<b>Xymmax</b>]] [[User_talk:Xymmax|<small><sup>So let it be written</sup></small>]] [[Special:Contributions/Xymmax|<small><sub>So let it be done</sub></small>]] 12:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)</small>
 *<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and actresses|list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions]].  </small> <small>-- [[User:Xymmax|<b>Xymmax</b>]] [[User_talk:Xymmax|<small><sup>So let it be written</sup></small>]] [[Special:Contributions/Xymmax|<small><sub>So let it be done</sub></small>]] 12:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)</small>