Jump to content

Davy lamp: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m copyedit
m Copyedit
Line 15: Line 15:


=== Accident rate ===
=== Accident rate ===
The introduction of the Davy lamp actually led to an increase in accidents in mines as the availability of the lamp encouraged the working of mines that had previously been closed for safety reasons.<ref>Christopher Lawrence, ''The power and the glory: Humphry Davy and Romanticism'', reference in Andrew Cunningham and Nicholas Jardine, ''Romanticism and the Sciences'' Cambridge: University Press, 1990 page 224 </ref>
The introduction of the Davy lamp actually led to an increase in accidents in mines, as the lamp encouraged working mines that had previously been closed for safety reasons.<ref>Christopher Lawrence, ''The power and the glory: Humphry Davy and Romanticism'', reference in Andrew Cunningham and Nicholas Jardine, ''Romanticism and the Sciences'' Cambridge: University Press, 1990 page 224 </ref>


== Modern Lamps ==
== Modern Lamps ==

Revision as of 03:24, 3 September 2008

Davy lamp

The Davy lamp is a safety lamp containing a candle, devised in 1815 by Sir Humphry Davy. It was created for use in coal mines, allowing deep seams to be mined despite the presence of methane and other flammable gases, called firedamp or minedamp.

Davy had discovered that a flame enclosed inside a mesh of a certain fineness cannot ignite firedamp. The screen acts as a flame arrestor; air (and any firedamp present) can pass through the mesh freely enough to support combustion, but the holes are too fine to allow a flame to propagate through them and ignite any firedamp outside the mesh. The first trial of a Davy lamp with a wire sieve was at Hebburn Colliery on 9 January 1816.

Gas Detector

The lamp also provided a crude test for the presence of gases. If flammable gas mixtures were present, the flame of the Davy lamp burned higher with a blue tinge. Miners could also place a safety lamp close to the ground to detect gases, such as carbon dioxide, that are denser than air and so could collect in depressions in the mine; if the mine air was oxygen-poor (asphyxiant gas), the lamp flame would be extinguished (black damp or chokedamp).

Comparison with Geordie lamp

There was some controversy, since George Stephenson also produced a similar safety lamp in 1816 called the Geordie lamp.

Supporters of both men seem to have regarded the other as having plagiarised their man's idea. The Geordie lamp (with no gauze around the flame) gave a brighter light and was popular with the miners. The Davy lamp was simpler and cheaper, and was popular with mine owners.[citation needed]

There were safety arguments on both sides: in principle, a poorly maintained (or badly designed) Davy lamp could overheat the gauze if it met a high concentration of methane. The gauze rusted easily in the damp mines, making the lamp hazardous. The Geordie lamp could become unsafe if the glass was broken. Both original lamps were faulty, and led to attempts at improvement, by using multiple gauzes above the flame, and with a glass surround to improve illumination. They were poor sources of light and the situation did not improve until the introduction of electric hand lamps in the Victorian period.

Accident rate

The introduction of the Davy lamp actually led to an increase in accidents in mines, as the lamp encouraged working mines that had previously been closed for safety reasons.[1]

Modern Lamps

The modern day equivalent of the Davy lamp is the Protector GR6S Garforth lamp which is used for firedamp testing in all UK coal mines. A modified version of this lamp is used to transport the Olympic Flame for the torch relays. They have recently been used for the Sydney, Athens, and Turin torch relays and will be used for the Special Olympics Beijing relay. The lamps are still made in Eccles.

References

  1. ^ Christopher Lawrence, The power and the glory: Humphry Davy and Romanticism, reference in Andrew Cunningham and Nicholas Jardine, Romanticism and the Sciences Cambridge: University Press, 1990 page 224