Jump to content

User talk:El Sandifer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Noroton (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:
==MfD nomination of [[Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]]==
==MfD nomination of [[Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]]==
[[Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 10:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 10:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

== Please take another look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC ==

This is a message sent to a number of editors, and following [[WP:CANVASS]] requirements: Please take another look at [[Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC]] and consider new information added near the top of the article and several new proposals at the bottom. If you haven't looked at the RfC in some time, you may find reason in the new information and new proposals to rethink the matter. -- [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] ([[User talk:Noroton|talk]]) 02:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:26, 22 September 2008

Monkeys?

RfC on Weathermen, Ayers, Dohrm, Obama, and "terrorism"

Please note that I have created an RfC to discuss the matter of whether, how, and where we should use and cover the designation "terrorist" describe the Weathermen and their former leaders. It is located here: Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC. The intent is to decide as a content matter (and not as a behavioral issue regarding the editors involved) how to deal with this question. I am notifying you because you appear to have participated in or commented about this issue before. Feel free to participate. Thank you. Wikidemon (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Palin wheel war case request for evidence

Copying this to all admins who applied or extended protection on the Sarah Palin article.

To date there's been plenty of evidence pointing to discussions and otherwise offering commentary on the admin actions taken, but there's been little covering the circumstances prior to admin actions, namely the edits that the admins concerned based protection on. Newyorkbrad has put a question to the parties on this basis, but it seems to be only non-parties that have noticed that so far, so I'm putting this question to those involved directly.

Rootology has made a start here, and GRBerry has started drafting in his userspace. Ye might like to assist them in their efforts, or add a section of your own. This evidence will be vital in assisting the Committee's understanding of not only what happened and when, but why it happened. --bainer (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page two

Phil, quick question you may know the answer too, you've been here longer than me. Have we ever explored the idea of having a (page two) for articles. For example, Superman is growing again, and rather than break out areas into sub-articles, I was wondering why we don;t have a link at the bottom which says <next page>? Some sites do it, some don't. Has it ever been discussed? Hiding T 10:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tabbed articles

Hi Phil. Risker has pointed me here from some thinking I'm doing about the benefits of tabbed articles (examples here and here). He said the matter had been raised on the en-l mailing list - but I can't find it. Would you be interesting in sharing your thoughts? Also if you have any techy/developer stalkers here, I could really do with some input regarding the feasibility of some of it, what would be easy/difficult to implement, better technical solutions etc. regards --Joopercoopers (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:List of templates linking to other free content projects during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take another look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC

This is a message sent to a number of editors, and following WP:CANVASS requirements: Please take another look at Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC and consider new information added near the top of the article and several new proposals at the bottom. If you haven't looked at the RfC in some time, you may find reason in the new information and new proposals to rethink the matter. -- Noroton (talk) 02:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]