User talk:Mattflaschen: Difference between revisions
→Comments requested on "Don't restore removed comments" page: add note on Image:YouTube Saari.JPG |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 02:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC) |
--[[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 02:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Clay Aiken== |
|||
I missed that the CNN article was still being used as the source. Which incidentally didn't in any capacity reference Perez Hilton. Nevertheless thanks for updating it, though why you had to do so in an insulting manner when you could clearly see the People article existed is beyond me, but whatever. - [[User:Mixvio|mixvio]] ([[User talk:Mixvio|talk]]) 11:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Welcome == |
== Welcome == |
||
Revision as of 11:42, 24 September 2008
Please sign your comments when posting to my talk page. Also, be aware that I clear this page occasionally without notice. Old conversations are available in the page history and through the links below:
Talk Page Archives:
--Superm401 - Talk 02:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Clay Aiken
I missed that the CNN article was still being used as the source. Which incidentally didn't in any capacity reference Perez Hilton. Nevertheless thanks for updating it, though why you had to do so in an insulting manner when you could clearly see the People article existed is beyond me, but whatever. - mixvio (talk) 11:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Take Care
SimonMayer 20:18, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
WikiJerk
I nominate this user as a WikiJerk Darkshark0159 (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry you feel this way. This should be taken as constructive criticism, not an attack. You have clearly lost your way on Wikipedia. Darkshark0159 (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
If you would have read the article, you would realise the difference between Jerk and WikiJerk. I will post here to explain:
A WikiJerk is a wikipedian who has been a great contributor in the past, but has now lost their way. They can be found abusing their privileges and attempting to boss other, smaller users around by belligerently "enforcing" wikirules that have really, put simply, been bent. This includes focusing on irrelevant details, when there are much more important issues at hand. These users feel that they are continuing to help Wikipedia, but the reality is otherwise. While WikiJerks have a history of positive contributions, they now simply hold Wikipedia back from being the best it can be.
In other words, who the hell cares of part of an image is grey-area. Just sod off and let the article be the best it can be.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkshark0159 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Newspeak!? Rofl. I am quite sure it is you who speaks in Newspeak. Brainwashed by the rules page perhaps? Darkshark0159 (talk) 00:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia fork
Hello Superm401, I'm contacting you regarding a Wikipedia fork, and its compliance of. Bahaikipedia uses many of the Wikipedia articles outright, such as [1], [2], etc. I've asked the owner of that website, who has a Wikipedia account User:T0lk, to abide by the GFDL, but for the most part he hasn't really done much. You can see the thread here User_talk:T0lk#Bahaikipedia He's just included a link to Wikipedia in the references section, and also has offered to include a link in the external links section. I see that as a problem because it's seen as one of many references or external links when this is a copyright issue. I've asked him to place a notice such as in the answers.com page, but he's so far refused. He's asked for a third opinion, and that's why I'm writing you. Could you possibly add to the discussion. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Comments requested on "Don't restore removed comments" page
I've got real problems with this essay and noticed you had some as well. I'm putting in my two cents on the matter and thought you might be interested. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Don%27t_restore_removed_comments Red Harvest (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:YouTube Saari.JPG
Could you offer some advice on the likely copyright holder of this image? The fair use template requests this and I would like to avoid hassle over disputed fair use. --♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 10:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
