Jump to content

Talk:CipSoft: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Replacing {{WP MMOG}} with {{WikiProject Video games}} per request
Lodan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


Putting in fluffy filler words to describe people could be considered vandalism as well - don't put people on a pedastal, that is not information, it's opinion. This isn't a bedtime story, it's a database. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/137.142.71.132|137.142.71.132]] ([[User talk:137.142.71.132|talk]]) 18:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Putting in fluffy filler words to describe people could be considered vandalism as well - don't put people on a pedastal, that is not information, it's opinion. This isn't a bedtime story, it's a database. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/137.142.71.132|137.142.71.132]] ([[User talk:137.142.71.132|talk]]) 18:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Messed up article==
The whole article is currently useless. The little information that is given is unstructured and partly wrong.

Revision as of 11:31, 29 September 2008

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Gee, I really should start proofreading material before I submit. OneGyT 22:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Took out the stub thingy, what else is there to say?

omg ur a conservative, intelligent design is freaking criminal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.193.42 (talkcontribs) 23:43, March 11, 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to argue about politics here. But anyway, aren't there longer articles that still have the stub template on them? OneGyT/T|C 02:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I beleive everything that can be said about Cip has been said here, lets not abuse stubs
Fair enough then. OneGyT/T|C 22:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed some vandalism. Maybe a lock if this continues? I'm also going to remove the "Fansites" from this article, because it is based on CipSoft, and the "FanSites" are for their game... --Haktivex 14:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated Vandalism

Wikipedia is a repository for information. Regardless of the tendency of a page to get vandalized, the page should represent an accurate description of the intended topic. As such many of the reverts that have been preformed border on vandalism. Instead of completely removing all content from a page, users should try to edit only the parts of the page that require it. Because of this I am reverting this page in order to preserve past contributions.Darkwraith 14:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for restoring a more informative version. due to the lack of time i couldn't do this myself but didn't want to let the completely useless article the way it was, so i just removed everything but 1 sentence to get rid of the rants at least. Lodan 16:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Putting in fluffy filler words to describe people could be considered vandalism as well - don't put people on a pedastal, that is not information, it's opinion. This isn't a bedtime story, it's a database. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.142.71.132 (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messed up article

The whole article is currently useless. The little information that is given is unstructured and partly wrong.