Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Strawberry Fields Forever/archive3: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
cmt
comments
Line 18: Line 18:
*** http://oldies.about.com/od/thebeatlessongs/a/strawberryfield.htm (note that about.com isn't usually considered a reliable source)
*** http://oldies.about.com/od/thebeatlessongs/a/strawberryfield.htm (note that about.com isn't usually considered a reliable source)
*** http://www.beatlesbible.com/
*** http://www.beatlesbible.com/
**** removed; replaced w/ reliable source
** current ref 29 (Beatles Bible) is lacking a publisher
** current ref 29 (Beatles Bible) is lacking a publisher
*** again, removed
: Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
: Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:43, 9 October 2008

Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I want it promoted to Featured Article.

Thanks, Kodster (heLLo) (Me did that) 22:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)

Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)