Jump to content

Talk:Sigma Rho: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:
==
==


==xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
== Semi-protection ==

This article has been semi-protected for two weeks because of the edit warring over the "Deaths" section. For now, the section remains, however this is '''not''' an endorsement of the current version. Please discuss your views here. Thank you. '''''<font color="darkblue">[[User:Harryboyles|Harryboyles]]</font>''''' 02:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

:I think the current version is fine. I have no knowledge of the story in question, but it seems relevant for the article since references are included. I only noticed the edit war when I was scanning recent changes. It appears someone connected/sympathetic with the fraternity is trying to remove criticism.--[[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|AgnosticPreachersKid]] ([[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|talk]]) 02:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

:::Current version is ok. The deaths were a big deal in the Philippines. I believe the anon that deletes the info has COI as they also "edited" a rival frat's [[Upsilon Sigma Phi|article]]--[[User:Lenticel|<span style="color: teal; background: white; font-weight: bold">Lenticel</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lenticel|<span style="color: green; font-weight: bold">talk</span>]])</sup> 03:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Why should you put "Related Violence" unless you have a malicious intent in the first place? Up to this date, all of the info under Related Violence (though covered by the media) aren't verified and should not be considered facts (therefore should not be put here).

Why should you put "Related Violence" unless you have a malicious intent in the first place? Up to this date, all of the info under Related Violence (though covered by the media) aren't verified and should not be considered facts (therefore should not be put here).
:The information is there because it received non-trivial press coverage (as proved by the sources). You seem to have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] with the subject matter. I would like to remind you that [[WP:CENSORED|Wikipedia is not censored]]. Your removal of this sourced material violates the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy. Please do not do it again. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Enviroboy|Enviroboy]]</span><sup>[[User talk:Enviroboy|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[special:contributions/Enviroboy|Cs]]</sub> 03:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This article should be semi-protected again for 1 week because User:Duck You always deletes Related Violence section.--[[User:Joseph Solis in Australia|Joseph Solis in Australia]] ([[User talk:Joseph Solis in Australia|talk]]) 07:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
:Make that ''full'' protect. --'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">Howard</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">the</font>]] [[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">Duck</font>]]''' 09:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok!, its good that this article will be protected.--[[User:Joseph Solis in Australia|Joseph Solis in Australia]] ([[User talk:Joseph Solis in Australia|talk]]) 06:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:07, 18 October 2008

WikiProject iconTambayan Philippines Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.



==

==xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx