User talk:SkyWalker: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:12, 10 November 2008

Status: Unknown

This is SkyWalker's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Tennis articles

Hi Skywalker - just to let you know, Tennis expert undid a lot of your unlinkings, and I've subsequently repeated the unlinking exercise, in an attempt to bring these articles in line with the MoS, but he's now busying himself undoing my work on those articles too. Colonies Chris (talk) 12:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if you guys need a hand. - Dudesleeper / Talk 12:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Tennis expert attacking either of you, too? I'm concerned that he may have lost all sense of proportion—possibly a major depressive disorder? Perhaps we can assist him. Tony (talk) 13:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a rest. Where is your sense of perspective? I don't agree with Tennis expert on everything but he is just trying to do what's best for the encyclopedia; there is no need for this frankly derisive diagnosis. What about WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Shouldn't they be adhered to just as strictly as WP:MOSNUM? Yohan euan o4 (talk) 01:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis expert doesn't seem at all interested in the fact that he is single-handedly preventing the entire tennis project from getting any good or featured content. That is a problem only he can solve but ceasing his continual ownership over each and every tennis bio. He was partly responsible for the delisting of Maria Sharapova through his ownership edits, and now the project has just one real tennis GA. No real FAs. Pathetic. What's the point in being part of a Wikiproject when all your edits are about preventing articles getting to GA or FA? What's the point in this project at all if not to create excellent, consistent articles? Tennis expert is simply not doing what is best for the encyclopedia. Read WP:WIAFA, point 2 - articles need to follow style guidelines. If people are supporting the continually linking of out-of-context words and dates then this encyclopedia is going to get worse. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 07:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your nightclub is getting deleted.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skywalkers nightclub :) MuZemike (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Empire: Total War

Even if that wasn't copy-pasted from the official site, it would still be unacceptable. These things need to be described concisely if put in prose, not dumped in with several paragraphs worth of fan material. This is where the other Total War articles fall down, often only telling players and fans how to play it through the faction details. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual, so this sort of stuff simply doesn't belong in the article. -- Sabre (talk) 12:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For you

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		For your work at Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 in cleaning and expanding the article. Keep it up, I am sure if we all work on it, GA-status is not far away. :-) So Why 19:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ::Is Tennis expert attacking either of you, too? I'm concerned that he may have lost all sense of proportion—possibly a [[major depressive disorder]]? Perhaps we can assist him. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 13:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 :::Give it a rest. Where is your sense of perspective? I don't agree with Tennis expert on everything but he is just trying to do what's best for the encyclopedia; there is no need for this frankly derisive diagnosis. What about [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:CIVIL]]. Shouldn't they be adhered to just as strictly as [[WP:MOSNUM]]? [[User:Yohan euan o4|Yohan euan o4]] ([[User talk:Yohan euan o4|talk]]) 01:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
+::::Tennis expert doesn't seem at all interested in the fact that he is single-handedly preventing the entire tennis project from getting any good or featured content.  That is a problem only he can solve but ceasing his continual [[WP:OWN|ownership]] over each and every tennis bio.  He was partly responsible for the delisting of Maria Sharapova through his ownership edits, and now the project has just one real tennis GA.  No real FAs.  Pathetic.  What's the point in being part of a Wikiproject when all your edits are about preventing articles getting to GA or FA?  What's the point in this project at all if not to create excellent, consistent articles?  Tennis expert is simply '''not''' doing what is best for the encyclopedia.  Read [[WP:WIAFA]], point 2 - articles need to follow style guidelines.  If people are supporting the continually linking of out-of-context words and dates then this encyclopedia is going to get worse.  [[User:The Rambling Man on tour|The Rambling Man on tour]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man on tour|talk]]) 07:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 == Your nightclub is getting deleted. ==