Jump to content

Talk:Elisabeth Moss: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by RootBoy42 - ""
Line 15: Line 15:
::: This is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elisabeth_Moss&diff=36821979&oldid=36088443 your edit], so you're definately apart of it (though not alone). Anyways, I'll let [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wikipediatrix this] speak for itself. --[[User:Thivierr|Rob]] 23:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
::: This is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elisabeth_Moss&diff=36821979&oldid=36088443 your edit], so you're definately apart of it (though not alone). Anyways, I'll let [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wikipediatrix this] speak for itself. --[[User:Thivierr|Rob]] 23:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
:::: But note that '''the basic info did not originate with me''', contrary to your unfair accusation. Someone else put it there, I thought it sounded fishy and disliked that it was unsourced, so I checked out and found it a source that verified the info. So basically, you're bitching me out for fixing an unsourced statement. I actually ''agree'' with you that it probably is a borderline OR issue, but your approach is so rude, in-your-face and hostile that it defeats any hope of having a good-faith edit consensus with you. Try losing the 'tude next time. [[User:Wikipediatrix|wikipediatrix]] 00:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
:::: But note that '''the basic info did not originate with me''', contrary to your unfair accusation. Someone else put it there, I thought it sounded fishy and disliked that it was unsourced, so I checked out and found it a source that verified the info. So basically, you're bitching me out for fixing an unsourced statement. I actually ''agree'' with you that it probably is a borderline OR issue, but your approach is so rude, in-your-face and hostile that it defeats any hope of having a good-faith edit consensus with you. Try losing the 'tude next time. [[User:Wikipediatrix|wikipediatrix]] 00:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

What's the purpose of this info: "has completed the Hubbard Qualified Scientologist Course, ARC Straightwire, Student Hat, Grade III Expanded, New Hubbard Professional TR Course, and New Hubbard Professional Upper Indoc TR Course services."? It's like saying a Catholic actor has received first communion, etc. [[Special:Contributions/24.163.127.19|24.163.127.19]] ([[User talk:24.163.127.19|talk]]) 04:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


== The West Wing ==
== The West Wing ==

Revision as of 04:25, 11 November 2008

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconScientology Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scientology

I removed the Scientology stuff about how a headache medication commercial conflicts with scientology. While the basic facts are public: membership in religion, religion's views, and her doing the commercial; the idea that there is any issue, is a novel original research, as it hasn't been widely written about (or if it has, no good source is given). We don't write about every actor who happens to have a role seemingly in conflict with their religion. Imagine all of the articles about actors portraying characters having pre-marital sex, who belong to a church that opposes it. This is a part of an ongoing campaign by one user, to put stuff about Scientology's beleifs in every bio article they possible can. I left a link to Scientology, for those who think its somehow relevant/signficant. Now, if relevant sources report this as being an issue for the actress, impacting her career and public reputation then it may be worth mentioning. I'm not opposed to the conclusion reached, I'm just objecting to original research being done to reach it.

P.S. I added her to "American actors" category. She was already in "Scientologists" (which I left). This tells you of the priorities some editors have. --Rob 22:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you incapable of editing these articles without making insulting, condescending, and just plain WRONG assumptions about what it is I am doing, and why am I doing it? And for your information, I didn't write the text about Aspirin conflicting with Moss' Scientology beliefs, some other editor did. Please get your facts straight and leave out your theories about my motivations behind my edits. wikipediatrix 23:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your edit, so you're definately apart of it (though not alone). Anyways, I'll let this speak for itself. --Rob 23:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But note that the basic info did not originate with me, contrary to your unfair accusation. Someone else put it there, I thought it sounded fishy and disliked that it was unsourced, so I checked out and found it a source that verified the info. So basically, you're bitching me out for fixing an unsourced statement. I actually agree with you that it probably is a borderline OR issue, but your approach is so rude, in-your-face and hostile that it defeats any hope of having a good-faith edit consensus with you. Try losing the 'tude next time. wikipediatrix 00:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's the purpose of this info: "has completed the Hubbard Qualified Scientologist Course, ARC Straightwire, Student Hat, Grade III Expanded, New Hubbard Professional TR Course, and New Hubbard Professional Upper Indoc TR Course services."? It's like saying a Catholic actor has received first communion, etc. 24.163.127.19 (talk) 04:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The West Wing

Her role as Zoey Bartlett on the Emmy winning "West Wing" should probably warrant a mention, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.79.43.110 (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC) (Right. I'm an idiot who didn't notice it at the VERY TOP OF THE ARTICLE! Sorry about that.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by RootBoy42 (talkcontribs) 17:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MTV Undressed

Wasn't she also in MTV Undressed? 71.233.174.226 13:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imdb

According to Imdb, she was born on July, 24. Who's right? --151.23.64.95 19:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC) It was me ^_^' --Ginosal 19:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]