Talk:The Dark Knight

Plot Summary

In the end of the summary it says that Dent is preparing to decide on the boys fate, but isn´t he deciding on Gordons fate? I think Gordon asked him to spare his son and Dent "agreed" and was about to shoot him (Gordon). Might be wrong, but perhaps someone could check it... 89.246.42.27 (talk) 21:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Gordon was trying to persuade him, but Dent never let the boy go and he still had the gun pointed at the boy the whole time.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Yup, Gordon asked Dent to punish him and Dent replied that he will, by killing his son. Andi (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

It was for Gordon's son. He pointed the gun to the boy's head and flipped his coin. --Harvey "Two-Face" Dent (Muhaha!!) 14:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

i think i can help now

can i edit here now? Boggydark (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

• If you can provide good info...I guess. --Harvey "Two-Face" Dent (Muhaha!!) 16:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

You've been a very naughty boy(?). But if you behave...have at it. --FilmFan69 (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

The Dark Knight Sequel

Just to let you know that there are hundreds of websites talking about the Dark Knight sequel. Questions like will Harvery Dent/Two-Face be the next villain, the casting of Catwoman and the Riddler, the Joker having a cameo, will Robin appear, or even the title of the next sequel. I know this page is super-long, but can we at least have it on the page. Because I'm ready to share them as soon as I can find them. Christianster45 21:25, 4 October 2008 9)

Batman (film series)#Future. Alientraveller (talk) 21:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

and wasnt Dent confirmed dead, Robin not appearing at all, and I already tried twice to proof that there even will be one. --Harvey "Two-Face" Dent (Muhaha!!); 02:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Check the archives, I think there's been evidence both ways on the Dent situation. As for Robin, Bale won't do a Batman film if there is a Robin.[1] Granted that's not a terrific source, but seems to come up on Google a bit. Latics (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Critical reception

The size of this section is utterly ridiculous. Fanboys doing their best to assure everyone of what a slice of genius it really is. The section is ludicrious in comparison for reception sections of other films and must be trimmed immediately.

I agree, but I think you need to calm down just a bit. You're acting like this page has offended you personally in some way, I don't see how that could be. Also, please do not personally attack other editors, not even generally (your "fanboys" comment), that is uncouthe and not tolerated at Wikipedia.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

If you're insulted by the word "fanboy", best check yo'delf. The section's too long. End. 79.71.215.203 (talk) 13:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Theatrical run —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.241.4 (talk) 06:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I just read through the critical reception section; I'm not concerned with it's length, but I don't think it's well-organized. Every paragraph is a summary of one critic's review, then saying that Denby didn't like it. Why not just let his reception have a paragraph of his own instead of trying to put a damper on the positive reviews? Bclare (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Spoiler

We need a spolier alert here... this would have ruined it for me had I not seen the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.102.22 (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

If you hadn't seen the movie, why would you read the plot section? Spoilers are obviously going to be placed in a section titled "Plot", that's why we don't put spoiler alerts up.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)