Talk:Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Greece): Difference between revisions
Miguel.mateo (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Thanks, |
Thanks, |
||
[[User:Miguel.mateo|Miguel.mateo]] ([[User talk:Miguel.mateo|talk]]) 01:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Miguel.mateo|Miguel.mateo]] ([[User talk:Miguel.mateo|talk]]) 01:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:If the recent editor is willing to change them all then I am not against the change otherwise I think we should just revert them for consistency [[User:Kevin hipwell|Kevin hipwell]] ([[User talk:Kevin hipwell|talk]]) 11:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:59, 6 December 2008
![]() | Greece B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Numismatics B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
To do list (for FL nomination)
- Wikilink
- Wikilink back
Done Copy/edit
Done Add market prices
Done References need formatting... all internet sources need publishers and accessdates. Look at WP:CITE/ES.
Done Use Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium) leading introduction, but change it accordingly.
Done Add the summary like in the previous article, change the white cells to "-"
Done Per WP:HEAD, "Market Value" should be "Market value"
Done WP:MOS#Foreign terms says foreign terms not in common English usage should be itallicised. Like Bois du Cazier for example.
Done "Issued: 16.10.2002" violates MOS:NUM#Dates ... change these dates!
Done Wikilink effigy & GDP if used
Done Link to Obverse and reverse only on the first issue of every section
- What is "Proof" "BU" ... wikilink them.
- Change all dates in the texts to day month year format instead of the month day, year
- Remove spaces between references and text.
- consider the {{convert}} template for us imperial measurement fans, for both diameter and mass.
- obverse and reverse should not be followed by side.
- Eurozone is capitalised but euro is not.
- no apostrophes in the names of decades—the correct form is "the 1950s"
- use straight apostrophes and quotation marks instead of curly
- Add texts if vissible in the coin with the translation
- Market value ... fix the market values to ranges (35-40[1][2] instead of 35[1] 40[2]) No issue value for these coins
- De-link the dates
- en-dash in tange of years (like 2000–2002 instead of 2000-2002)
Remarks
As requested I had a look at the page and my first comments would be: I noticed that some of the photos are slightly out of focus. For example:
20 Euro (2003) - Obv 100 Euro (2004) - Obv All the Obvs of 10 Euros (2004)
also The titles: Mount Pinder National Park - Birds and Flowers[31] Mount Pinder National Park - Black Pine Trees[31]
Should be Mount Pindos National Park - Birds and Flowers[31] Mount Pindos National Park - Black Pine Trees[31]
I'll have a closer look at some later point, but right now I am really nackered!
(Getas75 (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)).
- Hi Getas75,
- Thanks for your opinion, I do not remember why, but somehow I thought you might be interested in seeing this article, so I am glad you came back. I have changed some images for high resolution ones, but I do not find them all. Do you know of any source that have higher resolution images for the Olympic coins?
- Thanks again, Miguel.mateo (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Recent changes to the names of some sections
Hi,
A recent editor changed some names of some sections, saying that this is what WP:MOS recommends. I want to know what the others feel about it, since if this is the case we should change all articles. My opinion is, since Belgium went through the WP:FL process and passed without these recent changes, I do not see the need to get them done, but I have nothing against them either. I just think it is important to have consistency across all articles.
Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 01:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- If the recent editor is willing to change them all then I am not against the change otherwise I think we should just revert them for consistency Kevin hipwell (talk) 11:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)