Talk:Thomas Urquhart: Difference between revisions
Bot (Plugin) Tag Category:17th century deaths. Added {{WPBiography}}, living=no. |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: Then ignore the OCR; the DjVu files are copies of the images and are just fine.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 19:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC) |
: Then ignore the OCR; the DjVu files are copies of the images and are just fine.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 19:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
The linked lecture is superb. Thanks to whoever linked it. [[Special:Contributions/76.27.232.185|76.27.232.185]] ([[User talk:76.27.232.185|talk]]) 19:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Appearance in historical fiction == |
== Appearance in historical fiction == |
Revision as of 19:55, 25 December 2008
![]() | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
|
Willcock link
I removed this link: (Book at Internet Archive) -- although it's a good source, and one of the few works on Urquhart, this is an uncorrected OCR, so full of errors that it's unreadable and almost unintelligible. I hope someday they get around to redoing it. PRiis 23:32, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Then ignore the OCR; the DjVu files are copies of the images and are just fine.--Prosfilaes 19:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
The linked lecture is superb. Thanks to whoever linked it. 76.27.232.185 (talk) 19:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Appearance in historical fiction
There's another appearance I am a little dubious about mentioning, because it involves a spoiler... the character is introduced only as "Sir Thomas", and it is only after he names his ancestors back to Adam, talks about his scheme for a universal language, and makes some other extravagant claims that the sufficiently knowlegable (or Google-skillful) reader will figure out who he is. Do y'all reckon said novel should be mentioned here? --Jim Henry 00:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)