Jump to content

Talk:Thomas Urquhart: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reedy Bot (talk | contribs)
Bot (Plugin) Tag Category:17th century deaths. Added {{WPBiography}}, living=no.
Line 8: Line 8:


: Then ignore the OCR; the DjVu files are copies of the images and are just fine.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 19:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
: Then ignore the OCR; the DjVu files are copies of the images and are just fine.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 19:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

The linked lecture is superb. Thanks to whoever linked it. [[Special:Contributions/76.27.232.185|76.27.232.185]] ([[User talk:76.27.232.185|talk]]) 19:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


== Appearance in historical fiction ==
== Appearance in historical fiction ==

Revision as of 19:55, 25 December 2008

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I removed this link: (Book at Internet Archive) -- although it's a good source, and one of the few works on Urquhart, this is an uncorrected OCR, so full of errors that it's unreadable and almost unintelligible. I hope someday they get around to redoing it. PRiis 23:32, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then ignore the OCR; the DjVu files are copies of the images and are just fine.--Prosfilaes 19:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The linked lecture is superb. Thanks to whoever linked it. 76.27.232.185 (talk) 19:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appearance in historical fiction

There's another appearance I am a little dubious about mentioning, because it involves a spoiler... the character is introduced only as "Sir Thomas", and it is only after he names his ancestors back to Adam, talks about his scheme for a universal language, and makes some other extravagant claims that the sufficiently knowlegable (or Google-skillful) reader will figure out who he is. Do y'all reckon said novel should be mentioned here? --Jim Henry 00:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]