Jump to content

Talk:Carians: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 24: Line 24:
<ref>http://evolutsioon.ut.ee/publications/Rosser2000.pdf</ref>
<ref>http://evolutsioon.ut.ee/publications/Rosser2000.pdf</ref>
<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_origins_of_the_Turkish_people</ref>
<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_origins_of_the_Turkish_people</ref>
[[User:Lycianhittite|Lycianhittite]] ([[User talk:Lycianhittite|talk]]) 00:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:27, 9 January 2009

Turkish Name of the Caria

As most of the direct descendants of the Carians and other ancient anatolian civilizations currently speak Turkish but are mostly of ancient anatolian ancestry, the name of these civilizations should also be provided in Turkish language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lycianhittite (talkcontribs) 23:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-huh. Do you have any concrete evidence to substantiate your claims? If you do, then enlighten us. Deucalionite (talk) 14:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to scientific studies more than %85 of Turkey's population is formed of indigenous anatolians

1).. In the present study, the Central Asian contribution to Anatolia was estimated as 13% .. [1]

2).. One study based on an analysis of Y-chromosomes from Turkey suggested that Central Asians have only made a 10% genetic contribution..

Rolf B, Röhl A, Forster P, Brinkmann B. "Genomic diversity: applications in human population genetics". 75–82 Kluwer Academic/Plenum

3).. Recent genetic research has suggested the local, Anatolian origins of the Turks and that genetic flow between Turks and Asiatic peoples might have been marginal .. [2] [3] Lycianhittite (talk) 00:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]