Jump to content

User talk:Luther Hull: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Unblock declined.
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


{{unblock reviewed|1=The "malicious" page move was a tester that I didn't expect to actually move. My bad. The Barnstar was a light-hearted joke, not a personal attack, and as it was on a talk page I see no harm to Wikipedia. Furthermore, I'd like to add that after reading the admin discussion I'm quite heart that I'm seen as only having "two good faith" edits, I've made numerous contributions to discussion on articles. Anyway, as the Barnstar was misconstrued can we not all just make up and get along? As a Wrestling fan I feel I can help a lot on the road to WrestleMania.|decline=The ANI discussion indicates that, no, we can't. — <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 19:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=The "malicious" page move was a tester that I didn't expect to actually move. My bad. The Barnstar was a light-hearted joke, not a personal attack, and as it was on a talk page I see no harm to Wikipedia. Furthermore, I'd like to add that after reading the admin discussion I'm quite heart that I'm seen as only having "two good faith" edits, I've made numerous contributions to discussion on articles. Anyway, as the Barnstar was misconstrued can we not all just make up and get along? As a Wrestling fan I feel I can help a lot on the road to WrestleMania.|decline=The ANI discussion indicates that, no, we can't. — <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 19:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|[http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?p=776282#post776282 Admins opinion.]}}

Revision as of 19:56, 11 January 2009

Yo I'm Luther_Hull, this be my talk page.

WrestleMania XXV

WWE uses both names. Since that is a controversial move, you should make a move request per WP:RM and set up a discussion. TJ Spyke 18:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

This is your only warning.
The next time you move a page maliciously, as you did to WikiScanner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -MBK004 18:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Posting fake warnings such as this is just as bad as maliciously moving pages. Stop this behavior immediately or your editing privileges will be revoked for good. This is not a place to joke around and have fun, we are here to build an encyclopedia. -MBK004 18:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for malicious page moves, fake warnings, personal attacks and other behavior that indicates that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -MBK004 19:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luther Hull (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Personal attacks? Where? The others I will regrettably admit to, but I see no personal attacks.

Decline reason:

Here's one. but if you're admitting to malicious page moves, fake warnings and other behavior then, well, don't let the door, etc. — ➨ ЯEDVERS a reasonably good buy 19:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To admin review: I have placed this block up for discussion on ANI: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Block_review_requested -MBK004 19:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luther Hull (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The "malicious" page move was a tester that I didn't expect to actually move. My bad. The Barnstar was a light-hearted joke, not a personal attack, and as it was on a talk page I see no harm to Wikipedia. Furthermore, I'd like to add that after reading the admin discussion I'm quite heart that I'm seen as only having "two good faith" edits, I've made numerous contributions to discussion on articles. Anyway, as the Barnstar was misconstrued can we not all just make up and get along? As a Wrestling fan I feel I can help a lot on the road to WrestleMania.

Decline reason:

The ANI discussion indicates that, no, we can't. —  Sandstein  19:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Luther Hull (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}