Talk:Multirole combat aircraft: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:45, 3 February 2009

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Aircraft Stub‑class

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Military history: Aviation Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

The term "multirole" is not just limited to combat aircraft. A C-130, for instance, is also a multirole aircraft. Askari Mark (Talk) 18:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JAS Gripen

I'd like the Gripen to be added to Europe. 217.210.224.224 22:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done ... but added to Sweden. Askari Mark (Talk) 14:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the tornado really be in the list? I know its name included "multi-role", but actually any given variant was either a strike aircraft or an interceptor (none were both). If it is included then should other planes eg Saab Viggen? F-15? MiG-23? All of these have both ground attack and interceptor/fighter varients.

Revision as of 05:40, 13 July 2008 edit Canglesea (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 43,858 edits m tag ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:45, 3 February 2009 edit undo 217.155.6.122 (talk) →‎JAS Gripen: Should tornado be removed? Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Done ... but added to Sweden. [[User:Askari Mark\|Askari Mark]] <small>[[User talk:Askari Mark\|(Talk)]]</small> 14:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)		:Done ... but added to Sweden. [[User:Askari Mark\|Askari Mark]] <small>[[User talk:Askari Mark\|(Talk)]]</small> 14:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

			Should the tornado really be in the list? I know its name included "multi-role", but actually any given variant was either a strike aircraft or an interceptor (none were both). If it is included then should other planes eg Saab Viggen? F-15? MiG-23? All of these have both ground attack and interceptor/fighter varients.